ANTONIO CARDINAL BARBERINI, iuniore (1607-1671), was the son of Carlo Barberini and Costanza Magalotti. He was the nephew of Pope Urban VIII (Maffeo Barberini, 1623-1644), of the Capuchin Antonio Card. Barberini, seniore, (1624), and of Lorenzo Card. Magalotti. His brother Francesco became Cardinal on the election of their uncle to the papacy, and his brother Taddeo became Prince of Palestrina and Prefect of Rome. He was the cousin of Francesco Maria Card. Machiavelli (who became cardinal in 1641), and uncle of Carlo Cardinal Barberini (1653). He was Grand Prior in Rome of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem.
The accession of his uncle brought Antonio Barberini and his brothers many positions of power, wealth and influence. He became Cardinal Deacon of S. Maria in Aquiro in 1627, and Camerlengo of the Holy Roman Church on July 28, 1638, a position which he held until his death on August 3, 1671. In that capacity he presided over the Conclaves of 1644, 1655, 1667 and 1669-1670. The authoritarianism, arrogance and greed of the family ("Quod non fecerunt Barbari, fecerunt Barberini.") brought a strong reaction on the death of Urban VIII. In 1645 Antonio and Taddeo fled to Paris (where Urban VIII had once been ambassador), and remained in exile at the Court of Louis XIV (under the patronage of the Sicilian Giulio Card. Mazzarini) until 1653; he became Grand Almoner of France and a member of the Order of the Holy Spirit. In 1657 he was nominated Archbishop of Rheims, a choice which was approved by Pope Alexander VII. He became Cardinal Bishop of Palestrina in 1661. He died in Rome on August 3, 1671.
Cardinal Barberini was Cardinal Camerlengo during the conclaves of 1644, 1655, 1667 and 1670.
The Dean of the Sacred College was Cardinal Francesco Barberini, Bishop of Ostia and Velletri, nephew of Pope Urban VIII and brother of Cardinal Antonio Barberini. His nephew, Carlo Barberini, was also a member of the College of Cardinals.
The Governor of the Conclave, Msgr. Girolamo Casanate (1620-1700), was born at Naples on June 13, 1620, the son of a leading senator and sometime diplomat. He studied the law at the University of Naples and practiced as a lawyer. He became the protegé of Giovanni Battista Cardinal Pamfilj, who had been Nuncio to the Court of Naples from 1621-1625, and who convinced Girolamo's father, during a diplomatic visit to Rome, to allow his son to take up the ecclesiastical profession. When Pamfilj became Pope Innocent X in 1644, Casanate was named Chamberlain of Honor, and was appointed papal governor of several cities in the Papal States, Sabina, Fabriano, Camerino, and then Ancona. At Camerino, he became acquainted with Bishop Emilio Altieri, who became Pope Clement X in 1670. From 1658 to 1662 he was Inquisitor at Malta. He was created Cardinal deacon by Clement X on June 12, 1673. In 1693 he was appointed Vatican Librarian (Bibliothecarius Sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae). He took part in the conclaves of 1676, 1689 and 1691. He died in Rome on March 3, 1700.
The Marshal of the Conclave was Prince Giulio Savelli (1626-1712), the second son of Prince Bernardino Savelli, Prince of Albano (1606-1658) and Felice Peretti, the heiress of Pope Sixtus V. He married Caterina Aldobrandini, daughter of Pietro Aldobrandini, Duke of Carpentino, and then Caterina Giustiniani. The family was perpetually in financial difficulties: in 1596 they sold Castel Gandolfo to the pope, and in 1650 the duchy of Albano. He succeeded his father as Marshal of the Holy Roman Church in 1658. He had one son, who predeceased him. On his death in 1712, the hereditary office of Marshal ceased.
The Governor of Rome (1666-1668) was Msgr. Federico Borromeo, Patriarch of Alexandria (1654-1670). He had previously been Governor of Ascoli (from 1643). Governor of Benevento (1646-1648), and Inquisitor in Malta (from 1652). He was Nuncio in Switzerland from 1654 until 1665. He was created Cardinal Priest of S. Agostino in December, 1670. He died in 1673.
The Secretary of the College of Cardinals was Abbot Augustinus Favoritius, canon of the Basilica Liberiana (S. Maria Maggiore).
The Magistri Ceremoniarum were: Franciscus Maria Phoebeus (Archbishop of Tarsus, from April 1667), Fr. Ambrosius Landucius, OESA (Bishop of Porphyreon in Phoenicia), Carolus Vincentius Carcarasius, Fulvius Servantius, and Petrus Antonius de la Pedacchia.
Pope Alexander VII (Chigi), at the age of sixty-eight, had been suffering from kidney stones for some time, and around the beginning of March he began to fail; in constant severe pain, he was unable to give the Easter blessing. On the 15th of April, after having received Extreme Unction, the Pope wanted to address the Cardinals [Laemmer, 53]:
Dixit SSmus se iam in lectulo mortis positum et moriturum optavisse etiam antea alloqui Cardinales, medicorum tamen iudicio distulisse. Gravissimos et internos dolores passum fuisse, ac tales ut vix maiores in morte esse crederet. Defecisse tamen Dei gratia cruciatuum vehementiam, et imminutos si non sedatos dolores, de divinae voluntati conformari, etiamsi adderet dolores, dummodo augeret patientiam. In illius sperare misericordia, cuius non est numerus, ac orare ut sui misereatur nec reminiscatur delicta sua vel maiorum suorum, aut vindictam sumat de peccatis suis, quando quidquid divina bonitas de suo facit, est ex misericordiaa, quidquid ipsi patimur, est ex iustitia... Demum cum orationes et preces Cardinalium ad Deum efflagitasset, apostolicam eis benedictionem est impertitus.
The Dean of the Sacred College, Cardinal Francesco Barberini, made a reply, and then, at the Pope's nod, the Profession of Faith was brought forward, which the Pope read, clause by clause, and signalled his adherence by an oath on the Gospels.
By the 24th of April the politicking about the succession had already begun (Petruccelli, 195, quoting Onorato Gini da Nizza, the Resident in Rome of Carlo Emmanuele II, Duke of Savoy). On the 18th of May a severe fever set in, and Alexander VII died on May 22, 1667 (Novaes, 172-173). A pasquinade was immediately posted, claiming to summarize Alexander's last words to the cardinals: maxima de se, magna de parentibus, mala de principibus, pessima de cardinalibus, et nihil de Deo. ['He thought most about himself, a great deal about his relations, bad about the rulers, worst about the cardinals, and nothing about God']
The French already had a candidate and were working on a plan. At the Conclave of 1655, when Hughes de Lionne had been Ambassador Extraordinary of King Louis XIV, he had come to know and respect Msgr. Giulio Rospigliosi, then Archbishop of Tarsus (1644-1657), who had returned to Rome after his successful Nunciature in Spain (1644-1653). During the Conclave, Rospigliosi was elected by the Cardinals to serve as Governor of Rome. In his first promotion of cardinals, on April 9, 1657, the new Pope, Alexander VII, made Msgr. Rospigliosi a cardinal. Having become Secretary of State and Foreign Minister to Louis XIV (1663-1671), it occurred to Lionne that Cardinal Rospigliosi, who was now Secretary of State (1655-1667) and noted for his prudence and broad view of affairs, might make a good successor to Pope Alexander. The Cardinal's nephew, Giacomo Rospigliosi, was also in great favor with the French. He had been with his uncle in Spain and had taken a Doctorate in utroque iure at Salamanca. he had been Chamberlain to Pope Alexander's nephew, Cardinal Flavio Chigi, and had been sent to France in 1664 to prepare the way for the Embassy of Cardinal Chigi to King Louis XIV. Giacomo Rospigliosi had visited Paris a second time while on his way to his post as Internuncio in Flanders. Louis XIV had ordered Lionne to assure Cardinal Rospigliosi, who had done the French a number of favors, of his protection.
When Pope Alexander's approaching death became obvious, Louis ordered the Duc de Chaulnes, his Ambassador in Rome, to undertake discussions with Cardinal Rospigliosi with regard to his being elected pope (Petruccelli, 197-199). When Lionne himself had been Ambassador, his lively sense of humor and his good spirits were a bit much for the papal court. The new Ambassador was more reserved and more esteemed by the Cardinals. The Duke was careful to share the information as to the candidacy of Rospigliosi only with d'Este, Grimaldi and Retz. The French, however, disposed of eight votes among the cardinals (according to the Venetian Orator Giacomo Quirini: Relazioni, 327; and Cardinal Azzolini, Petruccelli III, 203). Where were the other votes to form a two-thirds majority to come from? The King himself was always a problem. As Cardinal Azzolino remarked in a letter to Lord Arlington on March 21, 1667 [Petruccelli III, p. 203]:
"Les Français prennent grand soin de ce conclave, beaucoup plus que des autres passés, à cause de l'orgueil de leur roi actuel, habitué à faire prévaloir sa volonté. Ce que ce roi désire le plus, c'est d' avoir le pape futur ami, et il peut, moyennant argent, très-fracilement satisfaire ce désir; car il y a un grand nombre de cardinaux pauvres.
But bribery could become simony in a papal election, and great caution was needed. The King had sent Abbe Bonzi to guide the movements of the inexperienced Cardinal de Vendôme, but Bonzi had been an agent of Cardinal Antonio Barberini for a long time and his interests were compromised. Barberini was therefore able to obtain accurate information of the plans and activities of the French faction.
Cardinal Friedrich von Hessen-Darmstadt, son of Landgrave Ludwig V, represented the interests of the Empire.
The Ambassador Ordinary of Venice was Giacomo Quirini (November 1663-December 1667); his successor, Antonio Grimani, had already been selected, but it had been decided not to replace the current ambassador in the light of the critical health of Alexander VII (according to Grimani's own relazione: Relazioni, 350).
The Marquis d' Astorgas represented Spain. The Venetian Oratore Giacomo Quirini estimated (after the fact) that the Spanish had available twenty-two votes in the Conclave.
At the death of Pope Alexander on May 22, the College of Cardinals was at full strength, seventy members. Two cardinals died on June 5—Volumnio Bandinelli and Francesco Maria Sforza Pallavicino. This reduced the number of living cardinals to sixty-eight. An official list of the participants is attached to the Motu Proprio, Nos Volentes, of Clement IX, dated August 2, 1667 [Bullarium Romanum Turin edition 17, iii, pp. 517-528, at 525-528]; it lists the names of sixty-four cardinals. Four cardinals did not attend.
At the beginning of the Sede Vacante, there had been some disagreement as to where the Conclave should be held. The younger cardinals, looking at the old Vatican Palace, which had not been lived in for some time, and which seemed very inconvenient, especially in the heat and humidity of the summer, indicated that they wished to hold the Conclave at the Quirinal Palace. There was also a good deal of demolition and construction in the immediate neighborhood due to the construction of the new Piazza S. Pietro. Naturally, the older cardinals, citing tradition, insisted on the Apostolic Palace of the Vatican. Tradition prevailed.
The Conclave of 1667 lasted eigteen days. It began on Thursday, June 2, 1667, in the Vatican Basilica, with the Mass of the Holy Spirit, sung by Cardinal Barberini, the Dean of the Sacred College. The oration de pontifice eligendo was pronounced by Fr. Stefano Gardi (Gradio) Raguseo, Custodian of the Vatican Library (Romae: ex Typogr. Nicolai Angeli Tinassi 1667). From St. Peter's a procession of the Cardinals moved to the Capella Paolina. Sixty cardinals entered conclave on that day. In the Capella Paolina the three bulls on conclaves were read out, and the appropriate solemn oaths sworn by each of the Cardinals. A number of cardinals then returned to their palazzi, since the Conclave would not be enclosed until the evening. Two other Cardinals, who were too ill to enter conclave, died on June 5—Cardinals Francesco Sforza Pallavicino and Volumnio Bandinelli (Brusoni, 394). Cardinal Albergati-Ludovisi entered conclave on June 6, and Cardinals Donghi and Santa Croce on June 10.
Cardinal Chigi, the Cardinal nipote, whose faction was comprised of about thirty-four members, was working in favor of Scipione Cardinal d' Elci (Archbishop of Pisa, but a Florentine), in order (it is said) to please the Grand Duke of Tuscany, Ferdinando II (1621-1670). Cardinal Antonio Barberini, who led another faction of abour sixteen members, and who was usually well-disposed toward French interests, was supporting the ambitions of his brother Francesco, who had been an active candidate in the Conclave of 1665 [Leti, Histoire des conclaves II, pp. 547-548]. The others factions were the French, the Spanish and the 'Squadrone Volante'. It is likewise alleged that the same members of the Squadrone volante (minus Cardinal de Retz, who had been reconciled to the French King), who had so greatly influenced the election of Alexander VII in 1665, also operated effectively in producing another new pope.
In the period before the Conclave began, Cardinal Imperiali, the leader of the Flying Squadron,was working on promoting the candidacy of Cardinal Carlo Bonelli, and he was being pressed in that direction by the Duke of Savoy [Petruccelli III, 204-205]. He was able to assemble some 44 votes (according to the Histoire des conclaves II, 548) from the Spanish, the Flying Squadron, and the creature of Chigi. But the French reacted strongly and negatively, since Bonelli seemed to be totally in the pocket of the Spanish. And when Cardinal Francesco Barberini discovered the plans, he took measures to protect his own candidacy, rallying the "older cardinals" of Urban VIII and Innocent X. That spelled the end of Bonelli's chances.
Among all the papabili, however, the likely candidates were Cardinal Girolamo Farnese (the French supported him, and Chigi was favorable), Scipione d'Elci (the preference of the Grand Duke of Tuscany, to whom Chigi was also favorable), and Giulio Rospigliosi. The 'Squadrone Volante', however, was opposed to Farnese, and they claimed they could provide thirty-four votes, some of them Spanish (plus Cardinal Barberini), to give him a 'virtual exclusion'. The Count of Montaviti, the envoy of the Grand Duke in Rome, was campaigning for Elci, and had tried to enlist both Cibo and Rossetti. Elci's father had been the Grand Duke's envoy in Spain, and Elci had a pension from the Spanish government; that made him suspicious to the French. Also, Elci was greatly disliked by the people of Rome, who made an embarassing demonstration in opposition to him at the Entrance to the Conclave, shouting that he should be burnt at the stake [or so says Leti, Histoire des conclaves II, 550]. As far as Rospigliosi was concerned personally, he had nothing to be said against him. He was known both in France (His nephew Giacomo had visited Versailles when he was pro-Nuncio in the Netherlands) and in Spain (where he had been Nuncio between 1644 and 1653). He was the current Secretary of State, and was even-handed in directing papal policy.
The first scrutiny took place on Saturday, June 4. The maximum effort was put forth for Farnese by all of his supporters, but Savelli and Caraccioli acted as though they were hostile to Farnese, and they carried along Litta and Carafa into opposition against him. Francesco Barberini and his followers also cast their votes elsewhere. The Flying Squadron produced enough of the votes that they claimed to have, so that Farnese was unable to reach the required two-thirds vote.
On Sunday, June 5, people were still speaking for Farnese, and after him for Rospigliosi. Cardinal Chigi was campaigning openly for Elci. But Chigi was inexperienced in the politics of conclaves, and had less influence than he hoped. He had trouble conceiving of a grand plan and executing it. And yet, if he were not on the side of a particular candidate, his following was large enough (as many as 34 votes) to form the nucleus of a 'virtual veto' of the candidate by denying him the two-thirds vote that was required. This was the message carried to Chigi, in fact, on Monday the 9th, by Cardinal Barberini, representing his own faction as well as the Squadron Volante, and others.
On Monday, June 6, Palotta had ten votes in the morning scrutiny, and nine in the afternoon. But that was the end of his candidacy. Cardinals would not waste their votes supporting someone who could not progress, unless supporting him for a time was part of a different strategy [Histoire des conclaves II, 551]. On Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, Rospigliosi continued to make a good showing, which kept his candidacy alive. In fact, the rumor in Rome was that he was as good as elected.
On Thursday, June 9, Chigi and Barberini entered into a deal that they would try to elect Rospigliosi. Chigi had evidently done some thinking about Barberini's message of Monday. They believed that they now had the votes. The news spread through the Conclave. But when the scrutiny took place on June 10, Rospigliosi's vote total had suddenly descended to fifteen. Apparently he was not as well-liked as some seemed to think, and he had his secret enemies after all. Or perhaps it was just that some leaders had not yet had the opportunity to send their favorites to the scrutiny, and were not yet prepared to make a compromise.
After the chances of Elci had collapsed, Cardinal Azzolini, who had made an honest effort on his behalf of Elci in order to accommodate Chigi, decided that it was time to talk to Chigi about the candidacy of Rospigliosi. He pointed out to Chigi that a pope could, after all, be elected without his cooperation, and that even an enemy of Chigi could be elected. Rospigliosi was not an enemy of Chigi. Chigi was prepared to give in, but he required that Barberini and the Flying Squadron guarantee a minimum of twenty-five votes. Azzolini immediately went to Barberini to acquaint him with the proposed bargain.
On the twentieth of June, Giulio Cardinal Rospigliosi, Cardinal Priest of S. Sisto, Titular Bishop of Tarsus, was elected with only two dissenting votes, that of Cardinal Rospigliosi himself and Cardinal Corsini, who voted for Cardinal Chigi. But the final vote-count was not correct—one vote was missing. It was discovered that Cardinal de Retz, who was the scrutator in charge of the balloting, had given his ballot to Cardinal de Vendome to place in the chalice at the appropriate moment; Vendome had somehow not carried out his charge. Nonetheless, the election was held to be valid.
Rospigliosi was crowned Clement IX on June 26 in the Vatican Basilica, by Cardinal Rinaldo d' Este, and on Sunday, July 3, he took formal possession of S. Giovanni Laterano. He was received by Cardinal Flavio Chigi, the Archpriest of the Lateran Basilica and nephew of Alexander VII. When Pope Clement was seated on his throne, each of the Cardinals made their obeisance and kissed the Pope's hand. He handed each Cardinal a gold and a silver commemorative medallion [Cancellieri, Solenne possessi, pp. 275-286].
Cardinal Decio Azzolini was named Secretary of State (June 25, 1667—December 9, 1669). Cardinal Pietro Ottoboni was named Papal Pro-Datary.
Hugo Laemmer, Zur Kirchensgeschichte des sechszehnten und siebenzehnten Jahrhunderts (Freiburg i.B. 1863), pp. 53-54 [Cod. S. Petri in Vinc. 75, f. 397: "Discorso fatto a Cardinali da Alessandro VII. in punto di morte"]
For the Conclave of 1667, see: Conclave de Clement IX., ou Journal de ce qui s' est passé pendant le Siège Vacant , et durant le Conclave , dans lequel fut éleu Pape le Cardinal Jules Rospigliosi, natif de Pistoye (Paris: Charles de Sercy, 1669) ['from a ms. found in the Room of Cardinal Farnese']. Conclave fatto per la Sede Vacante d' Alessandro VII (1669) [Novaes, Introduzione I, 299]. Girolamo Brusoni, "Life of Clement IX," in Storia delle vite de' pontefice di Bartolommeo Platina e d' altri autori . . fino a Clemente XIII . . . Tomo IV (Venezia Domenico Ferrarin 1765), pp. 394-398, at 394-395; [Gregorio Leti], Conclavi de' Pontefici Romani nuova edizione, riveduta, corretta, ed ampliata Volume III (Cologne: Lorenzo Martini 1691)1-94. Giuseppe de Novaes, Elementi della storia de' sommi pontefici da San Pietro sino al ... Pio Papa VII third edition, Volume 10 (Roma 1822) 183-184. F. Petruccelli della Gattina, Histoire diplomatique des conclaves Troisième volume (Paris 1865), 195-224.
Joannes Baptista Gattico, Acta Selecta Caeremonialia Sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae ex variis mss. codicibus et diariis saeculi xv. xvi. xvii. Tomus I (Romae 1753). Francesco Cancellieri, Storia de' solenni Possessioni de' Sommi Pontefici, detti anticamente Processi o Processioni dopo la loro Coronazione dalla Basilica Vaticana alla Lateranense (Roma: Luigi Lazzarini 1802).
N. Barozzi and G. Berchet (editors), Relazioni degli stati europei lette al Senato dagli Ambasciatori Veneti nel secolo decimosettimo Serie III. Italia, Relazioni di Roma. Volume II (Venezia 1878).
John Bargrave, Pope Alexander the Seventh and the College of Cardinals  (Camden Society 1867) [to be used with caution, as it incorporates material from Gregorio Leti, a most hostile and unreliable source]. Leopold von Ranke, The Popes of Rome (tr. S. Austin) Volume 3 (London: John Murray 1866), pp. 392-394. Leopold von Ranke, History of the Popes, their Church and State (translated by E. Fowler) revised edition, Volume III (New York: The Colonial Press 1901), 41-42. T. A. Trollope, The Papal Conclaves as They Were and as They Are (London 1876), 339-340 [relies on Gregorio Leti, Histoire des conclaves]. A. Bozon, Le cardinal de Retz à Rome (Paris: Plon 1878), 79-97. R. Chantelauze, Le Cardinal de Retz et ses missions diplomatiques à Rome (Paris: Didier 1879), 447-480. Charles Gérin, Louis XIV et le Saint Siège Volume II (Paris 1894), 165-205. P. Blet, "Louis XIV et le Saint Siège," XVIIe Siècle, no. 123 (1979), pp. 137—154.
Patritius Gauchat (editor), Hierarchia Catholica Medii et Recentioris Aevi Volumen Quartum (Monasterii 1935), 3-33.
© 2008, 2009 John Paul Adams, CSUN