Professor: Christie
Logan
Office: MZ 342 phone: 818 677-2859
Office Hours: Tu & Thurs 11:30 - 12:15 and 2:00 - 3:15, & by
appt.
| Course Description |
The category text is, of course, a sign with a history. (When I was your age...) "Text" used to refer to a tidy and specific category of written discourse. A text was a linguistic document of ideas and experiences that existed in written or printed form - such creations as books, treatises, manuscripts, etc. Later, visual languages (photos, film, art) were added to the category; then sounds (music, oral and aural texts), then places (landscapes, built environments). Text takes various forms in and through various media.
We will begin with the broadest definition I can think of: A text is anything that generates meaning. The various approaches in this course will provide a series of theoretical lenses that focus on particular dynamics of how meanings are generated. You will choose a text to work with all semester, and apply the approaches to examine:
Etymologically, the root of "text"
is the same as that of "textile" and "texture" -- a Latin word meaning
to weave. Recent and not-so-recent developments in the field of textual
studies have encouraged a return to the etymological meaning of the metaphor,
interpreting all discourse and action as part of a general process of weaving
in which human
beings create and re-create (or, more precisely, produce
and reproduce) our identities, communities, institutions, ideologies, societies,
cultures, and worlds.
In this course we will examine texts as symbolic expressions of identity, difference, experience, culture, community, and meaning, proceeding with the assumption that culture consists of an ongoing system of meanings, practices, and institutions in which personal and communal experience is articulated in diverse and dynamic forms. These "articulations", so named by Stuart Hall, interact within ongoing, permeable symbolic systems that reflect, enable, and constrain cultural meanings, realities, and identities.
Course materials, assignments and discussions will converge on the underlying
questions of how individuals and communities choose to present and represent
themselves and their experience through symbols, how we construct and articulate
our social identities, and ultimately how we embody, reflect and construct
our culture through the texts we generate and attend to.
Keith Negus & Michael Pickering, Creativity, Communication and Cultural Value. Sage, 2004.
Mikko Lehtonen, The Cultural Analysis of Texts. Trans. Aija-Leena Ahonen & Kris Clarke. Sage, 2000.
Nicholas Mirzoeff, Watching Babylon: The War in Iraq and Global Visual Culture. Routledge, 2005.
Eric Louw, The Media & Cultural Production. Sage, 2001.
Paul Rabinow, ed. The Foucault Reader. NY: Pantheon
Books, 1984.
** recommended site: The Foucault
Pages at CSUN, developed and maintained by Professor Ben Attias.
Online readings appear as links on the Course Schedule.
Extent and quality of CONTRIBUTION to
class discussions and activities (will include course newsgroup
or listserv, providing discussion questions and additional readings). |
20% |
Expressiveness,
the Pull of the Text Paper. 5-6 page analysis of creative, expressive
and formal dynamics of your chosen text, using Negus & Pickering,
Langer, Lehtonen & others as relevant. |
15% |
Dynamics
of Meaning Paper.
7-9 page analysis of text-audience interactions and dynamics of your chosen
text, using, Negus & Pickering, Lehtonen, Mirzoeff, Louw,
and others as relevant. |
20% |
Text
as Social Production Paper.
9-10 page interpretive and critical analysis of your chosen text as an arena
in which the “struggle over meanings” is articulated, negotiated, contested,
etc, using Foucault, Louw, Negus & Pickering, Mirzoeff, and
others as relevant. |
20% |
Culminating
Analysis and Critical Intervention. 12-15 page paper using
approaches of your choosing. This
paper may incorporate portions of your previous work and will include a rationale
for your choice of approaches and an assessment of critical
tenets as you apply them to your text. |
25% |
GRADING SYSTEM: Individual assignments are graded on a
standard 10% curve. The final
course grade will be plus/minus, determined by course totals.
Breakdown:
94-100 = A 90-93 = A- 87-89
= B+ 84-86 = B 80-83 = B- etc.
A Note on Some of the Reading: You may be reading textual theorists and critics who refer to a number of texts you may not have read. Don’t get lost in these references - focus instead on
Mechanical and Stylistic Competence: Your papers
should be error-free when you hand them in.
For all written assignments, students are required to use either the
American Psychological
Association (APA) or the Modern Language
Association (MLA) style manual
for documenting
references. I also recommend you use UC Berkeley's very useful Style
Sheets for Citing Resources (Print & Electronic). All written work should
be typewritten or
word
processed
and double-spaced, with
standard fonts and margins, footers and page numbers. Also give
your papers a thematic title - something besides "dynamics
of meaning paper" etc. Make me want to read what's inside!
Academic Honesty: Students are responsible for understanding and adhering to university policies regarding academic honesty, as specified in the current CSUN Catalog and Schedule of Classes. Here is the department policy on ethical standards for graduate students:
Academic honesty is expected and required. Academic dishonesty defrauds all those who depend on the integrity of University courses and is a serious offense covered by Section 41301, Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations. This section of the Code is published in the University Catalog, Schedule of Classes, and the Student Handbook. Academic dishonesty is grounds for dismissal from the graduate program and disciplinary action by the University.If you are uncertain about what constitutes cheating or plagiarism, click here or consult the University Catalog and Schedule of Classes for definitions and information concerning your rights and responsibilities.
| Course Description |