College of Science and math/Dean's Office

  • DNA Rendering
  • Molecular Cell Rendering
  • Student working with Lab
  • Science and Math Student in LAB
  • CSUN College of Science and Math
  • CSUN College of Science and Math
  • CSUN College of Science and Math


Campus Indirect Cost Calculations

College Personnel Procedures

IT Equipment Purchase

 Procedure to Purchase IT Equipment, College of Science and Mathematics

Information Technology related purchases will be processed centrally through College Information Technology Department to improve uniformity and compatibility of our IT equipment and software, inventory review and better pricing.

The steps below provide information about the procedure to follow when departments are requesting IT equipment and software.

1. The budget for IT equipment and software purchases remains in each department.

2. Faculty or Staff requesting such purchases, completes the “IT Purchase Request/ Acquisition Form” and a designated employee (Chair/Dept. Secretary/Technician) should send the form signed by the dept. chair to CSMIT, mail drop 8238 OR email it to .

3. College IT personnel will evaluate, consult with the departments and process the order through online Solar Financial Requisitions or P-Card as appropriate, utilizing the corresponding Department ID for posting the purchases.

Policies and Procedures of Using Computing Labs

Policies on use of Computing Labs:

• Administration, installation, upgrading and removal of software (including plug-ins and system patches), and repair of all College lab computers will be done by authorized CSMIT technical support personnel, or authorized designees. Users authorized to use the College computing labs will not install any software applications, upgrades, patches or add-on software to any lab computer.
• All software uses in College computing labs should be licensed.
• Computers in computing labs have been configured in accordance with the academic needs of the students using the specific facility. Tampering with the files on any fixed or network drive, hardware or software, is not allowed.
• Programs, files or documents saved on lab computers are not backed up and may be accessed by anyone.
• CSMIT will be compliant with all procedures and policies detailed under University IT Procedures and Policies – Sector 500. The steps below provide information about the procedure to follow when departments are requesting IT equipment and software.

Installation Requests:

Instructors wishing to make software applications available to their students for educational purposes, either in the open lab, or in computer classrooms, may request such installation.
• Such requests may only be made by College faculty or staff.
• Generally, software installations for labs must be requested to CSMIT at least 2 weeks before the start of the semester in advance of the required use, in order to provide College technical support personnel the opportunity to test the software for functionality and for compatibility with the installed software base on the computers for which it is intended.
• Requests for software installations in the labs during the semester must also be requested to CSMIT at least 3 weeks in advance of the required use. The steps below provide information about the procedure to follow when departments are requesting IT equipment and software.
Lab Scheduling :

• To schedule a lab for use as a full-time / part-time classroom during the quarter, instructors should contact CSMIT through email.
• Labs available for periodic use are scheduled on a first-come, first served basis, so instructors should make such requests in a timely manner.

Connection of Personal Computer/Telecommunications Equipment:

• Users are not allowed to connect their personal equipment to the college wired network in the computer labs.

Policy on Research Bridge Funds

Policy on Research Bridge Funds, College of Science and Mathematics

The College of Science and Mathematics strongly supports scholarship and student mentoring. The College also recognizes that a vibrant research program depends upon external funding, and that awards by agencies such as the NSF, NIH, NASA, and DOE are extremely competitive. A year without grant support while teaching a heavy load can severely impact research productivity and the ability to submit proposals. The Research Bridge Fund Policy was developed to aid those faculty members whose grant(s) ended and are facing the prospect of a full teaching load. The College, with the help of the Provost’s Office, will provide bridge funding for a maximum of one year immediately following the end date of a major external grant. If the PI obtains a one year no-cost extension to the grant, bridge funding will only be provided during that extended year. 

A major grant is defined as one that generates at least $18,000 of indirect costs as described in the California State University, Northridge Large Grants Policy. Under the College’s Research Bridge Funds Policy the PI will be provided with reassigned time equivalent to that received during the externally funded period, up to 12 units per year. The reassigned time must be used during the regular academic year, over one or two semesters. In addition, the PI will receive up to $5,000 for O&E to maintain their lab. In order to be eligible for the funds, the PI:

  1. must have submitted a proposal for a major grant as defined above during the last year of the ending external grant (or grants). In addition, it is expected that during the year of bridge funding, the PI will demonstrate good use of the reduced teaching load by submitting additional external grant proposals and peer-reviewed manuscripts. OR
  2. will submit a proposal for a major grant during the year of the no-cost extension (when they are being supported by the bridge funding). This intention to submit a proposal must be stated in the request for bridge funding and justified with a submission plan that includes at a minimum plans for final data collection, manuscript submissions, and proposal submission deadlines. It is also expected that during the year of the bridge funding, the PI will demonstrate good use of the reduced teaching load by submitting additional external grant proposals and peer-reviewed manuscripts either in the same year or in the subsequent year.

Funding under the Bridge Policy will continue until funding from a major grant begins, but not for more than one academic year. 

Requests for Bridge Funding should be directed to the Dean of the College of Science and Mathematics. Applications need to include a description of eligibility (specify the expiring grant, the proposal submitted during the final year if applicable, and provide copies of the relevant proposal approval forms), the number of reassigned time units being requested, the amount of O&E requested with a justification, a current CV, and a brief letter of support from the Department Chair.

All materials must be received in the Dean’s Office no later than May 1st


Renovations/Projects: From Planning to Completion, College of Science and Mathematics

1. Any faculty member wanting renovations should first contact the department technician/representative and Department Chair. Together they will then develop a preliminary plan for the project.

2. The faculty member and department representative will then meet with the shop staff to go over the preliminary plan and the shop staff will develop a final plan in consultation with the department representative and faculty member. The shop staff will forward the final plan, in the form of a written Work Request and scale drawing, to the faculty member, department representative, and MAR.

3. The department representative sends the shop drafted Work Request and drawing to PPM as part of the requisition for an estimate. When the estimate comes back from PPM, the department representative will notify the shop staff that the project has been accepted or rejected.

4. Normally once the project has started the shop staff acts as the liaison between the College and PPM, keeping the department representative informed as needed. If there is communication between PPM and the department representative, it is important that the shop be informed. Any change in the scope of work must be communicated to the science shop.

5. The shop staff will inform the department representative when the project is completed.

Use of Facilities

Dr. Jerry Stinner / Dean, College of Science and Mathematics                                       Date: 02/18/2009

It is the policy of the College of Science and Mathematics that laboratory facilities, equipment and supplies are only to be used by College faculty, staff and students in the pursuit of instructional and research endeavors. Any exceptions to this policy must have prior written approval by both the Dean of the College and Provost. All departments within the College must comply with this policy. This policy was discussed and agreed upon by the College Dean and Department Chairs at a meeting on February 18th, 2009.

CSM Limited Submission Pre-Proposal/Proposal Review and Recommendation Guidelines

CSM Limited Submission Pre-Proposal/Proposal Review and Recommendation Guidelines

  • When granting agencies limit the number of submissions to one per university, and there are multiple pre-proposals/proposals from faculty members within the College of Science and Mathematics, the Department Chairs will normally meet to review and rank them. Reviews should at a minimum be based upon the granting agencies guidelines, the clarity and quality of the written pre-proposals/proposals, and the impact upon the College and University.
  • In those cases in which a Department Chair is an investigator on a pre-proposal/proposal, that Chairperson will recuse him/herself from any discussions pertaining to their pre-proposal/proposal. That person can, however, participate in reviews of the remaining pre-proposals/proposals. If the Chairperson does not want to participate in the review process because of the potential conflict of interest, that person may choose an alternate committee member from their department.
  • When multiple Department Chairs are investigators on the pre-proposals/proposals, and the Committee of Department Chairs cannot reach consensus because of competing conflicts of interest, an alternate ad hoc review Committee shall be selected from among the tenured faculty members, with equal representation from each of the five departments.  Members of the faculty will be selected by the Department Chairs, with final approval by the Dean.
  • Recommended rankings will be forwarded to the Dean, who then may or may not meet with the review Committee members to discuss the rankings.
  • The Dean will make a final recommendation to the AVP for Research and Graduate Studies.
  • All pre-proposals/proposals must be written in accordance with any guidelines specified by the  Office of Research and Graduate Studies and/or granting agency, and be received by the Dean for review and ranking no later than two weeks prior to the Office of Research and Graduate Studies deadline.