History 371
Devine
Spring 2014
 
Study
Questions for Jay R. Mandle, Not Slave, Not Free, pp. 1- 67
 
Introduction
 
 - How
     did the relatively slow economic development in the South after 1865
     contribute to black poverty? 
     Conversely, how did black poverty help account for the South’s
     relatively slow economic development?
 
 -  How did limiting economic opportunities
     for blacks in the South in turn retard southern economic development more
     broadly? 
 
 - How
     might attempts to expand economic opportunities for African Americans
     enhance the economic growth rate of the nation as a whole? 
 
Chapter 1
 
 - Why
     was slave labor profitable for nineteenth-century southern planters? 
 
 - What
     effects did the reliance on slave labor have on economic developments in
     the South? 
 
 - Why
     does the author believe that implementing a policy of land redistribution
     (taking land from the planters and giving it to the freedman) would have
     produced a significantly different economic reality in the South after the
     Civil War?  Despite the Radical
     Republicans’ desire to “punish” the southern planters, why was such a
     policy never implemented? 
 
 - What
     was the intended purpose of the Southern Homestead Act?  Why did it fail in achieving its
     purpose? 
 
 - Why
     was the rate of black land ownership so low in the postbellum
     South? How did the inability to purchase and cultivate one’s own land
     contribute to black poverty?
     
 
 - Why
     did a system of plantation tenantry emerge in
     the South after the Civil War?  
 
 - Some
     historians have maintained that both planters and African American tenants
     preferred the sharecropping
     system.  What evidence does Mandle introduce to counter this argument?  How did the lack of access to credit
     limit the planters’ and tenants’ options?
     
 
 - Why
     did the failure of a black farmer-owner class to emerge in the South
     insure that Booker T. Washington’s “self help” strategy would not
     succeed?  What other major
     consequences occurred due to the lack of a black farmer-owner class and
     the persistence of a white-dominated plantation economy? 
 
 - According
     to Mandle, even if blacks acquired the skills
     necessary to succeed as commercial farmers, they were still likely to
     remain poor. Why? 
 
Chapter 2
 
 - Why
     does the author argue that the existence of a market for black
     agricultural labor in the South does not necessarily mean that black labor
     was “free”? 
 
 - What
     factors kept black labor in the South from being “free”?  Why was it hard for blacks to escape
     plantation labor?  Why didn’t they
     find work doing other things?
     
 
 - Mandle
     notes that there are three arguments for why blacks did not move north in
     order to escape the plantation system. 
     What are those arguments and why does he find one to be more
     persuasive than the other two?
     
 
 - Why
     could one argue that black labor was far less “free” than immigrant labor? 
 
 
Chapter 3
 
 - Why
     does the author believe that the way Census Bureau data was reported
     obscures the persistence of the system of southern plantation agriculture? 
 
 - What
     were the differences between the plantation and non-plantation areas of
     the South? Why was it more difficult for blacks to achieve an independent
     status in those areas of the South dominated by plantations than elsewhere
     in the region? 
 
 - What
     negative effects did strict planter supervision have on blacks’ chances to
     advance economically? 
 
 - How
     did the plantation credit system impede blacks’ economic progress? 
 
 - Why
     did it matter that in tenant-landlord relations, the landlord kept all the
     records? 
 
 - Mandle
     concludes this chapter by saying that “black southern poverty was
     structural.”  What does it mean to
     say poverty is “structural” as opposed to being, say, “cultural”? 
 
 
Chapter 4
 
 - If
     one is trying to measure economic development in the South (or lack of economic
     development), why is it useful to examine data from plantation and
     non-plantation regions separately? 
     What do we learn when we examine the data separately? 
 
 - How
     did advances in labor productivity in cotton compare with advances in
     wheat and corn?  What role did
     mechanization play in labor productivity?
     
 
 - What
     explanations have historians offered that might account for the slow rate
     of mechanization in cotton production? 
     According to the author, why are some explanations more compelling
     than others? 
 
 - Why
     were there relatively few attempts to solve the technical problems
     associated with producing cotton?
     
 
 - One
     scholar has maintained that the higher the demand for a product, the
     higher the demand for technological advances that would help produce the
     product more efficiently (see p. 52). 
     According to Mandle, did this formula
     apply to cotton production?
     
 
 - With
     regard to improving productivity by experimenting with new technological
     innovations, how did southern plantation agriculture differ from the family
     farm system of the North?  Why did
     northern family farmers actively embrace new labor-saving technologies
     while southern planters largely ignored them? 
 
 - According
     to Mandle, how did lack of education and lack of
     capital contribute to the slow pace of productivity growth in the South? 
 
 
Chapter
5
 
 - How
     did exclusion from the political process affect African Americans’ chances
     of escaping poverty? 
 
 - The
     historian Ulrich Phillips argued that the plantation system “was less
     dependent upon slavery than slavery was dependent upon it.”  What did he mean by this? 
 
 - Why
     is a “plantation” more than just a large farm that produces output for a
     market?  What characteristics does
     it have that differentiate it from other means of production? 
 
 - How
     do the concepts of “cultural hegemony” and “paternalism” shed light on how
     a plantation system works? 
 
 - How
     did whites sustain the system of “paternalism” in the South even after
     emancipation? What role did violence play? Why were many African Americans
     willing to adhere to the “racial etiquette” associated with paternalism
     even though the system was based on the assumption of white supremacy? 
 
 - Why
     does Mandle believe that it is more useful to
     characterize the postbellum South as operating
     under a “plantation” mode of production rather than a “capitalist” mode of
     production? 
 
Broader questions to consider…
 
 - Why
     does Mandle think that understanding what a
     “plantation economy” was is important if we are to understand why the
     South (and blacks in the South) remained poor?
 
 - How
     did the structure of the southern economy reinforce southern racism? 
 
 - Why
     was the South “economically backward” in the years from 1865 through 1920? 
 
 - To
     what extent was the economic experience of African Americans different
     from that of non-blacks between 1865 and 1920? 
 
 - How
     does Mandle’s exploration of African-Americans’
     economic experiences in the South between 1865 and 1920 shed light on the
     causes of disproportionate black poverty since 1920?