FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

DOMAIN 1

Components of Professional Practice

 

Domain I:        Planning and Preparation

 

Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy

Demonstrating Knowledge of Students

Selecting Instructional Goals

Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources

Designing Coherent Instruction

Assessing Student learning

 

 

Domain II:         The Classroom Environment

 

Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport

Establishing a Culture for Learning

Managing Classroom Procedures

Managing Student Behavior

Organizing Physical Space

 

 

Domain III: Instruction

 

Communicating Clearly and Accurately

Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques

Engaging Students in Learning

Providing Feedback to Students

Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness

 

 

Domain IV:  Professional Responsibilities

 

Reflecting on Teaching

Maintaining Accurate Records

Communicating with Families

Contributing to the School and District

Growing and Developing Professionally

Showing Professionalism


 

COMPONENTS OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE

 

Domain #1 - Planning and Preparation

 

A.      Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy

knowledge of content

knowledge of prerequisite relationships

knowledge of content-related pedagogy

 

B.      Demonstrating Knowledge of Students

knowledge of characteristics of age group

knowledge of students' varied approaches to learning

knowledge of students' skills and knowledge

knowledge of students' interests and cultural heritage

 

C.      Selecting Instructional Goals

value

clarity

suitability for diverse students

balance

 

D.      Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources

resources for teaching

resources for students

 

E.      Designing Coherent Instruction

learning activities

instructional materials and resources

instructional groups

lesson and unit structure

 

F.    Assessing Student Learning

congruence with instructional goals

criteria and standards

use for planning


 

 

Figure 6.1

DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

COMPONENT 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy

Elements:

Knowledge of content · Knowledge of prerequisite relationships · Knowledge of content-related pedagogy

 

 

ELEMENT

L E V E L   O F   P E R F O R M A N C E

UNSATISFACTORY

BASIC

PROFICIENT

DISTINGUISHED

 

Knowledge of Content

 

Teacher makes content errors or does not correct content errors students make.

 

Teacher displays basic content knowledge but cannot articulate connections with other parts of the discipline or with other disciplines.

 

Teacher displays solid content knowledge and makes connections between the content and other parts of the discipline and other disciplines.

 

Teacher displays extensive content knowledge, with evidence of continuing pursuit of such knowledge.

 

Knowledge of Prerequisite Relationships

 

Teacher displays little understanding of prerequisite knowledge important for student learning of the content.

 

Teacher indicates some awareness of prerequisite learning, although such knowledge may be incomplete or inaccurate.

 

Teacher’s plans and practices reflect understanding of prerequisite relationships among topics and concepts.

 

Teacher actively builds on knowledge of prerequisite relationships when describing instruction or seeking causes for student misunderstanding.

 

Knowledge of Content-Related Pedagogy

 

Teacher displays little understanding of pedagogical issues involved in student learning of the content.

 

Teacher displays basic pedagogical knowledge but does not anticipate student misconceptions.

 

Pedagogical practices reflect current research on best pedagogical practice within the discipline but without anticipating student misconceptions

 

Teacher displays continuing search for best practice and anticipates student misconceptions.

 

 

Reflect on these as you also examine the COE Conceptual Framework
 

DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

COMPONENT 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students

Elements:

Knowledge of characteristics (intellectual, social, and emotional) of age group · Knowledge of students’ varied approaches to learning · Knowledge of students’ skills and knowledge · Knowledge of students’ interests and cultural heritage

 

 

ELEMENT

L E V E L   O F   P E R F O R M A N C E

UNSATISFACTORY

BASIC

PROFICIENT

DISTINGUISHED

 

Knowledge of Characteristics of Age Group

 

Teacher displays minimal knowledge of developmental characteristics of age group.

 

Teacher displays generally accurate knowledge of developmental characteristics of age group.

 

Teacher displays thorough understanding of typical developmental characteristics of age group as well as exceptions of general patterns.

 

 

Teacher displays knowledge of typical developmental characteristics of age group, perceptions to the patterns, and the extent to which each student follows patterns.

 

 

Knowledge of Students’ Varied Approaches to Learning

 

Teacher is unfamiliar with the different approaches to learning that students exhibit, such as learning styles, modalities, and different “intelligences.”

 

Teacher displays general understanding of the different approaches to learning that students exhibit.

 

Teacher displays solid understanding of the different approaches to learning that different students exhibit.

 

Teacher uses, where appropriate, knowledge of students’ varied approaches to learning in instructional planning.

 

 

Knowledge of Students’ Skills and Knowledge

 

 

Teacher displays little knowledge of students’ skills and knowledge and does not indicate that such knowledge is valuable.

 

 

Teacher recognizes the value of understanding students’ skills and knowledge but displays this knowledge for the class only as a whole.

 

 

Teacher displays knowledge of students’ skills and knowledge for groups of students and recognizes the value of this knowledge.

 

 

Teacher displays knowledge of students’ skills and knowledge for each student, including those with special needs.

 

Knowledge of Students’ Interests and Cultural Heritage

 

Teacher displays little knowledge of students’ interests or cultural heritage and does not indicate that such knowledge is valuable.

 

Teacher recognizes the value of understanding students’ interests or cultural heritage but displays this knowledge for the class only as a whole.

 

 

Teacher displays knowledge of the interests or cultural heritage of groups of students and recognizes the value of this knowledge

 

Teacher displays knowledge of the interests or cultural heritage of each student.

 

Reflect on these as you also examine the COE Conceptual Framework
 

 


 

 

 

DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

Figure 6.3

COMPONENT 1c: Selecting Instructional Goals

Elements:

VALUE: Goals represent high expectations for students; and reflect important learning and conceptual understanding, curriculum standards, and frameworks · CLARITY: Goals are clearly stated as student learning and permit, sound assessment · SUITABILITY FOR DIVERSE STUDENTS: Goals reflect needs of all students in a class · BALANCE: Goals represent opportunities for different types of learning- for example, thinking as well as knowledge-and coordination or Integration within or across disciplines.

 

 

ELEMENT

L E V E L   O F   P E R F O R M A N C E

UNSATISFACTORY

BASIC

PROFICIENT

DISTINGUISHED

 

Value

 

Goals are not valuable and represent low expectations or no conceptual understanding for students. Goals do not reflect important learning

 

Goals are moderately valuable in either their expectations or conceptual understanding for students and in importance of learning

 

Goals are valuable in their level of expectations, conceptual understanding, and importance of learning.

 

Not only are the goals valuable, but teacher can also clearly articulate how goals establish high expectations and relate to curriculum frameworks and standards.

 

 

Clarity

 

Goals are either not clear or are stated as student activities. Goals do not permit viable methods of assessment.

 

Goals are only moderately clear or include a combination of goals and activities. Some goals do not permit viable methods of assessment.

 

Most of the goals are clear but may include a few activities. Most permit viable methods of assessment.

 

All the goals are clear, written in the form of student learning and permit viable methods of assessment.

 

Suitability for Diverse Students

 

Goals are not suitable for the class.

 

Most of the goals are suitable for most students in the class.

 

All the goals are suitable for most students in the class.

 

Goals take into account the varying learning needs of individual students or groups.

 

 

Balance

 

 

Goals reflect only one type of learning and one discipline or strand.

 

Goals reflect several types of learning but no effort at coordination or integration.

 

Goals reflect several different types of learning and opportunities for integration.

 

 

Goals reflect student initiative in establishing important learning.

 

 

To be genuine to Roosevelt University’s charter and the College of Education’s  commitment to caring and diversity in democratic learning communities, we advocate for social equality with special attention to educational resources. We  integrate justice concerns into the dynamics of educating and act on behalf of socially, economically, and politically marginalized peoples. This translates to underscoring the social relevance of education and advocating for public policies that will advance the well-being of learners through democratic practice.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 6.4

DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

COMPONENT 1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources

Elements:

Resources for teaching · Resources for students

 

 

 

ELEMENT

L E V E L   O F   P E R F O R M A N C E

UNSATISFACTORY

BASIC

PROFICIENT

DISTINGUISHED

 

Resources for Teaching

 

 

Teacher is unaware of resources available through the school or district.

 

Teacher displays limited awareness of resources available through the school or district.

 

Teacher is fully aware of all resources available through the school or district.

 

In addition to being aware of school and district resources, teacher actively seeks other materials to enhance instruction, for example, from professional organizations or through the community.

 

 

Resources for Students

 

 

Teacher is unaware of resources available to assist students who need them.

 

 

Teacher displays limited awareness of resources available through the school or district.

 

 

Teacher is fully aware of all resources available through the school or district and knows how to gain access for students.

 

 

In addition to being aware of school and district resources, teacher is aware of additional resources available through the community.

 

 

 

Reflect on these as you also examine the COE Conceptual Framework
 


 

DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

Figure 6.5

COMPONENT 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction

Elements:

Learning activities · Instructional materials and resources · Instructional groups · Lesson and unit structure

 

 

ELEMENT

L E V E L   O F   P E R F O R M A N C E

UNSATISFACTORY

BASIC

PROFICIENT

DISTINGUISHED

 

Learning Activities

 

 

Learning activities are not suitable to students or instructional goals.  They do not follow an organized progression and do not reflect recent professional research.

 

 

Only some of the learning activities are suitable to students or instructional goals.  Progression of activities in the unit is uneven, and only some activities reflect recent professional research.

 

 

Most of the learning activities are suitable to students and instructional goals.  Progression of activities in the unit is fairly even, and most activities reflect recent. Professional research.

 

Learning activities are highly relevant to students and instructional goals. They progress coherently, producing a unified whole and reflecting recent professional research.

 

Instructional Materials and Resources

 

 

Materials and resources do not support the instructional goals or engage students in meaningful learning.

 

 

Some of the materials and resources support the instructional goals, and some engage students in meaningful learning.

 

All materials and resources support the instructional goals, and most engage students in meaningful learning.

 

All materials and resources support the instructional goals, and most engage students in meaningful learning. There is evidence of student participation in selecting of adapting materials.

 

 

Instructional Groups

 

Instructional groups do not support the instructional goals and offer no variety.

 

 

Instructional groups are inconsistent in suitability to the instructional goals and offer minimal variety.

 

 

Instructional groups are varied, as appropriate to the different instructional goals.

 

Instructional groups are varied, as appropriate to the different instructional goals. There is evidence of student choice in selecting different patterns of instructional groups.

 

 

Lesson and Unit Structure

 

The lesson or unit has no clearly defined structure, or the structure is chaotic. Time allocations are unrealistic.

 

The lesson or unit has a recognizable structure, although the structure is not uniformly maintained throughout. Most time allocations are reasonable.

 

The lesson or unit has a clearly defined structure that activities are organized around. Time allocations are reasonable.

 

The lesson’s or unit’s structure is clear and allows for different pathways according to student needs.

 

 
DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

Figure 6.6

COMPONENT 1f: Assessing Student Learning

Elements:

Congruence with instructional goals · Criteria and standards · Use for planning

 

 

ELEMENT

L E V E L   O F   P E R F O R M A N C E

UNSATISFACTORY

BASIC

PROFICIENT

DISTINGUISHED

 

Congruence with Instructional Goals

 

Content and methods of assessment lack congruence with instructional goals.

 

 

Some of the instructional goals are assessed through the proposed approach, but many are not.

 

 

All the instructional goals are nominally assessed through the proposed plan, but the approach is more suitable to some goals than to others.

 

 

The proposed approach to assessment is completely congruent with the instructional goals, both in content and process.

 

Criteria and Standards

 

The proposed approach contains no clear criteria or standards.

 

Assessment criteria and standards have been developed, but they are either not clear or have not been clearly communicated to students.

 

Assessment criteria and standards are clear and have been clearly communicated to students.

 

Assessment criteria and standards are clear and have been clearly communicated to students. There is evidence that students contributed to the development of the criteria and standards.

 

 

Use for Planning

 

 

The assessment results affect planning for these students only minimally.

 

Teacher uses assessment results to plan for the class as a whole.

 

Teacher uses assessment results to plan for individuals and groups of students.

 

Students are aware of how they are meeting the established standards and participate in planning the next steps.

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

Domain #2 - The Classroom Environment

 

 

A.                 Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport

                        teacher interaction with students

                        student interaction

 

          B.        Establishing a Culture for Learning

          importance of the content

          student pride in work

          expectations for learning and achievement

 

          C.        Managing Classroom Procedures

          management of instructional groups

          management of transitions

          management of materials and supplies

          performance of non-instructional duties

          supervision of volunteers and paraprofessionals

 

          D.        Managing Student Behavior

          expectations

          monitoring of student behavior

          response to student misbehavior

 

          E.      Organizing Physical Space

          safety and arrangement of furniture

          accessibility to learning and use of physical resources

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Domain # 3 - Instruction

 

 

A.      Communicating Clearly and Accurately

directions and procedures

oral and written language

 

B.      Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques

quality of questions

discussion techniques

student participation

 

C.      Engaging Students in Learning

 

representation of content

activities and assignment

grouping of students

instructional materials and resources

structure and pacing

 

D.      Providing Feedback to Students

Quality:  accurate, substantive, constructive and specific timeliness

E.      Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness

lesson adjustment

response to students

persistence

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Domain #4 - Professional Responsibilities

 

 

A.            Reflecting on Teaching

accuracy

use in future teaching

 

B.      Maintaining Accurate Records

student completion of assignments

student progress in learning

non-instructional records

 

C.      Communicating with Families

information about the instructional program

information about individual students

engagement of families in the instructional program

 

D.      Contributing to the School and District

relationships with colleagues

service to the school

participation in school and district projects

 

E.       Growing and Developing Professionally

enhancement of content knowledge and pedagogical skill

service to the profession

 

F.       Showing Professionalism

service to students

advocacy

decision making

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE

(used for Midterm and Final Assessments)

 

 

Each element of a component has four levels of performance which range from describing teachers who are still striving to master the rudiments of teaching to highly accomplished professionals who are able to share their expertise.

 

1:      The teacher clearly understand the concepts underlying the component and implements it well.  Most experienced, capable teachers will regard themselves and be regarded by others as performing at this level.

 

2:      The teacher appears to understand the concepts underlying the components and attempts to implement its elements.

 

3:      The teacher appears to understand concepts underlying the components but implementation is intermittent or otherwise not entirely successful.  Additional reading, discussion, visiting classrooms of other teachers and experience will enable the teacher to become proficient in this area.

 

4:      The teacher does not yet appear to understand the concepts underlying the component.  Working on the fundamental practices associated with the elements will enable the teacher to grow and develop in this area.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Danielson, Charlotte, (1996).  Enhancing Professional Practice:

A Framework for Teaching, ASCD, Alexandria, VA

 Go to Domain 2

Return to HomePage