A Leadership
Toolbox
by Thomas H.
Hatfield
Strategies not on the
internet
1. Talk with your colleagues, supervisors, and directors about strategy and leadership. No web site needed here! That’s right – the people you work with every day should be your first source. In my younger days, I thought this exercise would be useful to learn what not to do. I didn’t always think I had the greatest supervisors… Years later, I realize it’s a lot harder than it looks, the vast majority of my supervisors were outstanding, and my concept of leadership has, well, evolved. In any event, your progress will undoubtedly depend on the very people in your office, so you may as well join the conversation. I am also amazed at how each story seems to raise new insights, even with colleagues I have known a long time.
2. Run for CEHA
office. I am always surprised by the folks who
claim that it’s so hard to break into leadership position. Running for CEHA office is actually
fairly easy, and you will get a great lesson in leadership with this group. I make no claim that CEHA is the perfect
organization (although we have a mighty fine journal…). But you don’t learn about leadership
under pristine conditions. Jump in,
get your hands dirty --
we’re waiting for you!
3. Read with an eye
towards strategy and leadership. This particular issue of the journal is
explicitly devoted to strategy and leadership, but every issue is
ultimately connected with these concerns. You will be surprised at
what you missed if you start reading with this focus.
Training
4. The Art and Science of Leadership. This is a fairly standard web site, but
it’s always good to have at least one traditional source that covers the basic
concepts of leadership. I welcome
alternate candidates.
5. CDC
Environmental Public Health Leadership Institute (EPHLI). This is the program that Mel Knight
referred to in his letter to the editor.
A number of Californians have participated in this program, including
Margaret Blood. Margaret details
some of her work with this group in her column of this issue. I have heard nothing but good things
about this program and, by the way, Mel and Margaret have both been recognized
as innovative and effective leaders.
6. 10 Essential Environmental Public Health
Services. Strategy seems
to begin by reviewing this classic work from the CDC. It is absolutely required reading for
anyone thinking about strategy and leadership in our
field.
7. Center
for Health Leadership and Practice The Center for Health Leadership
& Practice has designed and implemented a full range of leadership
development programs and consultation activities targeted to the public and
private health sectors, the community sector, and academia. Their partners include Alameda County,
the American Public Health Association, UC Berkeley, and UC San Francisco. They have suggested readings and
suggested web sites (independent of the list you are currently
reading).
Strategic
Action Plans
Strategic Plans. They can be
death laid out in 10 point font.
Many of them ultimately end up gathering dust. But for those willing to wade through
them, they can provide insights on the leaders who wrote or approved them, they
can provide clues for what is missing in your current strategy, and they can
even be insights on how things go wrong.
8. NEHA
Strategic Directions
NEHA has eschewed classical approaches to strategic planning in favor of
what they call strategic directions.
Since NEHA and
CEHA are formally affiliated, and since the next two incoming presidents of NEHA
are from California (Mel Knight and Alicia Enriquez), this is a huge opportunity
for CEHA members to become involved in strategy and leadership.
9. FDA
Strategic Action Plan
Although this plan is a few years old, it is instructive at several
levels: it lays out specific
strategies for strengthening the agency itself, which remains a timely theme
during the budgetary woes in California; it emphasizes the development of public
trust, which is also a recurring theme for agencies (see John Schillinger’s column in this issue); and it emphasizes
access to new products. It is
this last theme that may warrant further attention from our readers. The FDA is, of course, in a unique
position to emphasize access to products.
However, if we think of products in a broader way, such as online or
informational products, this could play a role in marketing the work of our
agencies.
10.
EPA’s
Strategic Plan EPA’s Strategic Plan sets
forth the Agency’s long-term vision, strategic goals and objectives, and
strategies to achieve them. The
Plan also introduces strategies for changing the way EPA does business, at
least two of which may be of interest to California agencies:
Strengthening partnerships, and Strengthening the workforce. While this may not always involve direct
connections to local agencies, it nevertheless hits upon themes that are
relevant to a larger population.
11.
Environmental
Health: High-level Strategy and Leadership Needed to Continue Progress toward
Protecting Children from Environmental Threats This EPA site is a good example of
providing justification for the renewed push for work on children’s health. Notice that it references previous
strategic plans in its justifications.
12.
EPA
Leadership. This site is
also devoted to children’s health protection, but is a good example of how the
EPA integrates their overall strategy into programs. In this case, the emphasis
is on outreach and partnerships, risk assessment, and development of standards
and regulations. This is a good
site to consult anytime the concerns of children arise (which is often), but
also a good look at how strategy translates to programs.
13.
NCEH
Strategic Plan O.K., so this is an older plan. But it is quite specific and
comprehensive in its treatment of performance measures. Soaring rhetoric can only go so far, and
this report is a good example of the specificity that can be achieved in
strategic plans.
14.
ATSDR’s Strategic Plan This plan is for the Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), and is closely tied to its budget
proposal. It is a good example of
how strategic plans tie to budget proposals.
15.
NIEHS Strategic Plan The National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) is, of course, a more research oriented
agency. However, it is interesting
to observe some of the same themes that appear in this strategic plan, including
partnerships, workforce development, and connecting new scientific knowledge
with public health decisions.
16.
California Department of Public Health Strategic
Plan This is an obvious
must-read for our readers, and repeats many of the themes mentioned in these
pages, including the essential public health services, the need for
partnerships, and even SWOT analysis.
17.
Cal EPA's first Agency-wide Strategic
Vision. This Strategic Vision commits the Agency
and its member boards, departments and office to better understand relationship
between social, economic, and environmental issues, with a focus on
simultaneously improving the quality of life in all three areas. It is a good example of many things,
especially in making connections between prevention and the economy.
18.
State Water Resources Control Board Strategic
Plan Instead
of including all the boards, we focus on this plan, because it makes specific
reference to the budget cuts and furloughs in California, with subsequent
effects on the completion of work from previous strategic plans. It even identifies shifts in priorities
as a result of the budget cuts. At
the same time, it is also careful to document accomplishments to date. It is a good example of strategic
plans during a time of dramatic budget cuts.
19.
OEHHA’s
Strategic Plan OEHHA's strategic plan charts the
direction we will take to accomplish our governing mission. The plan consists of
four primary goals, which are aligned with the agency-wide Strategic Vision of
Cal/EPA. Each goal is supported by a hierarchy of objectives and cross-media
strategies intended to address California’s environmental challenges in the air,
in the water, and on land and to identify processes that ensure we will achieve
measurable results.
20.
CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE OF DIRECTORS OF ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH This
site lays out the agenda for the next (as of this writing) CCDEH strategic
planning session. It provides clues
as to the next conversation you should have with your director. In all likelihood, your director will
already be approaching you with these issues. Still, it may help to pick up the clues.
21.
CEHA Strategic Plan
Committee And
finally, the most obvious of all strategic plans on our list: our own CEHA
Strategic Plan Committee. If you’ve
taken the time to wade through the previous reports, you’re an obvious candidate
for joining this committee. These
are the kinds of entries on a resume that lead to promotions, and my guess is
that it is the kind of conversation that is welcomed by supervisors and
directors.
22.
City, County, and
private strategic plans. The bad news is
that there are too many of these plans to list within this column. The good news is that you may have a
better chance in participating in these plans, especially if you’ve followed the
previously mentioned plans.
Awards
Finally, after you have demonstrated outstanding leadership
and strategic planning, you may as well pick up the accolades for your fine
work. But there is more to these
sites than just feeding your ego.
For one thing, you can pick up ideas by observing who is being awarded
and, more importantly, why they received these awards. And for another, it never hurts to show
support for your fellow Californians who do outstanding work for the
profession.
23.
NEHA awards Many of our California
readers have received these awards, and they tend to be regarded as leaders in
our field. It is easy for cynics to
regard these awards as nothing more than a collection of wood, glass, metal, and
bloated egos. But a closer look may
reveal the habits that led to these awards and, more importantly, the strategies
that led to genuine improvements in environmental health.
24.
CEHA Awards &
Scholarships Our
last stop on this list: CEHA.
It is understandable during these difficult budgetary times to lose
heart, or to imagine that it is impossible to accomplish outstanding work. But
the evidence from this group proves otherwise. Applications must be postmarked on or before February 11,
2011.