|
AT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE SELF-STUDY GUIDELINESBASIC PRINCIPLES FOR PROGRAM REVIEW · Program review is an opportunity for the program faculty to conduct an objective self-evaluation. This includes the opportunity to define program strengths as well as recognize challenges and engage in creative problem solving. · Program review and assessment are on-going processes. It is not intended that program faculty focus a great deal of energy on a one year self-study with no further reflection until the process begins again in five years. · Program review is the result of a faculty's involvement in self-reflection
and should be linked to the program's mission and strategic planning. The core of the review process is a self-study conducted by the faculty of the programs being reviewed. The self-study provides a description and analysis of programs as background for planning and for decision making. Interdisciplinary programs may cut across departments. The program faculty must be able to back up assertions and conclusions made in the self-study by providing data or citing examples. The preparation and reporting of the self-study requires three steps: 1) The gathering of descriptive information and generation of a description of the program. 2) Analysis of the program reflecting the descriptive data, including identification of strengths and weaknesses, as well as opportunities and challenges, of each program within the unit. 3) Plans for the future flowing from the assessment. Data supplied by Institutional Research and program survey information should be used to provide factual material for the generation of a description of the program. The report should contain materials related to every academic program offered including all separate degrees, options, minors, certificates, and credential programs. There is a separate section for discussion of the department's general education program and the graduate program(s) in the department. The self-study report should follow the format outlined on pages #2-3. The programs may exercise flexibility in responding to the self-study guidelines and what they deem as applicable to their own particular program. The program is not required to deal with all of the issues in each section. Some may or may not apply or may be less important than others, but a comprehensive analysis of the major sections must be performed with the assumption that most issues in a section are appropriate and will be covered.
The program chair, director or coordinator is responsible for the organization and development of the self-study. All of the program faculty must be consulted and given the opportunity to provide meaningful input. The program should consider the role students will play in the self-study.
1. COVER PAGE A. Name of instructional department or program
Describe the process by which the faculty were given the opportunity to participate in this self-study process and review the document before submission to the dean.
4. SELF-STUDY Present your data and analyses and plans in the following sequence of Sections "I" through "IX". Undergraduate programs must respond to Sections I, II, and IV-IX. Graduate programs must respond to Section I and Sections III-IX.
Include:
I. OVERVIEW
A. PROGRAM'S MISSION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 1. State the mission, goals and objectives of the program(s). Describe their relationship to the mission, goals and objectives of the department, of the college, and of the university. B. CURRICULUM Create a matrix showing which courses in your program meet the student learning objectives (SLO) of the program. Plot the program courses across the top of the matrix and the student learning objectives along the side of the matrix as shown in the following example: EXAMPLE OF MATRIX FOR COURSES TAUGHT AND STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVE(S) EACH COURSE FULFILLS COURSES TAUGHT:
If there is more than one program in the department a separate matrix should be completed for each program. 1. After completing the program matrix provide the rationale for the content and structure (numbering, sequencing, etc.) of the undergraduate curricula. 2. What process ensures that the objectives and content of courses lead clearly to achievement of the mission, goals, objectives, and student learning outcomes of the program? Describe the processes used to assure consistency in the content of required courses with multiple sections. 3. How are faculty, staff, and especially students informed of the program's objectives and student learning outcomes? How often and by what procedures are objectives and learning outcomes assessed? Provide copies of assessment tools used. How are the faculty informed of results of assessment? Describe how students are involved in the assessment process. What changes were made in the program as a result of assessment? 4. Describe the external needs/demands for the program, including such information as marketplace surveys, job placement of graduates, alumni surveys, graduate or professional school admission of program graduates, and local demand for program graduates as employees. Describe how new ideas, directions, technical advances, and innovations in the field have been incorporated into the curriculum. 5. How do articulation efforts with community colleges affect recruitment
of transfer students? Explain how the program encourages transfer students
to enter its programs and steps taken to assist transfer students in making
a smooth academic transition from their previous campus to CSUN. 7. If you have service courses in your program taught by other departments, how do you ensure that they meet the needs of your students? C. ADVISEMENT AND STUDENT SERVICES 1. Provide a brief description of the program's advisement process and identify procedures used to assess and improve it. 2. What does the program do to encourage faculty/student interchange outside of classes? 3. How many students in the program participate in research and/or creative and scholarly activities or service learning courses? D. DATA 1. Provide the number of degrees awarded by year for the past five years
in undergraduate programs. Discuss how enrollment trends over the past
five years relate to the mission, goals and objectives of the program,
college and university. 4. Identify special assistance, services, or activities which have been
provided by the program to students during the past five years in the
following areas: 6. How do the demographic characteristics of your faculty and the full-time/part-time faculty ratio affect planning in your program? E. GENERAL EDUCATION Create a matrix (or matrices) showing how the G.E. courses in your program
meet the learning outcomes of the applicable G.E. section or sections.
Plot the program's G.E. courses across the top of the matrix and the G.E.
section and learning outcomes along the side of the matrix as shown in
the following example:
A. MISSION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 1. State the mission, goals and objectives of the program(s) and describe their relationship to the mission and goals of the department, college and university. 2. How are faculty, staff, and especially students informed of the program objectives, including learning outcomes? How often and by what procedures are objectives examined and revised? B. CURRICULUM Create a matrix showing which courses in your program meet the student
learning objectives (SLO) of the program. Plot the program courses across
the top of the matrix and student learning objectives along the side as
shown in the following example: COURSES TAUGHT:
2. Describe procedures employed to ensure that the objectives and content of courses, as described in the course syllabi, lead clearly to achievement of the mission, goals, objectives, and learning outcomes of the program. Describe the processes used to assure consistency in the content of required courses with multiple sections. 3. Explain how students' learning outcomes are assessed by the program and provide copies of any assessment tools. How are the faculty informed of results of assessment? What changes in the program were made as a result of assessment? If considered, include information regarding evaluation of the following: content knowledge, critical and creative thinking, oral and written communication skills, and analytical skills. Describe the level at which students completing the program are successful in professional examinations. Describe how students are involved in the assessment process. 4. Evaluate the rationale for the content and structure of the graduate
curricula. 5. Describe any way in which the program(s) performs a service function, such as involvement in interdisciplinary, certificate, and/or credential programs for undergraduates. C. ADVISEMENT, ANALYSIS, AND ASSESSMENT 1. Provide a brief description of your advisement process and identify procedures used to assess and improve it. 2. Describe educational and professional goals of your students. Have
the educational, professional, career and/or life goals of the students
who choose the degree program changed over the last five years? (Summarize
the results of student or alumni surveys which the program has conducted
over the last five years.) 4. Identify special assistance, services, or activities which have been
provided by the department to students during the past five years in the
following areas: 3. What is the average time to complete a graduate degree in the program? 4. What average percentage of students in the program complete the program? How does the program address the needs of students unable to complete the program? 5. Describe the educational and career paths of your alumni of the last
five years.
1. Discuss the use and effectiveness of the various modes of instruction utilized in the program such as lectures, discussion sessions, laboratory work, etc. 2. Describe any innovative pedagogical approaches such as service learning courses, on-line curriculum, PACE programs, and internships. Indicate the level and source of the resources required to support these activities. 3. Describe the effect of program size on its ability to maintain instructional quality. Consider the scope and diversity of student needs that the program is designed to serve, the number of students enrolled and the number and expertise of faculty available to serve these needs.
Create a matrix showing courses taught by full-time faculty in the program. Plot faculty names across the top of the matrix and courses along the side of the matrix as shown in the following example: EXAMPLE OF MATRIX FOR DEPARTMENT FACULTY AND COURSES TAUGHT FACULTY NAME:
1. Describe how the preparation and interests of the faculty support
the curricular mission, goals and objectives of the program(s) (e.g.,
how many can teach required courses, how well their combined skills serve
the range of electives needed, what experiences qualify members to provide
appropriate service courses, etc.) 3. What notable creative and scholarly activities have your faculty been engaged in since your last five-year review? What has the program done to enhance opportunities for faculty in this area? 4. Describe the extent to which part-time faculty, lecturers and graduate assistants teach required and elective courses and, when appropriate, developmental courses. Describe the criteria by which they are selected and evaluated.
1. Describe the governance and administrative structure of the program including the role played by committees and individual faculty assignments. 2. Describe the means by which junior faculty are given opportunities to contribute to governance. 3. Describe any reassigned time provided for faculty participation in program governance. VII. SPECIFIC ISSUES, IF ANY, TO BE DETERMINED BY THE DEAN AND/OR PROGRAM IN CONSULTATION
1. How does the program align itself with existing resources? If additional resources were given how would they be used? 2. Identify any external funding (contracts, grants, gifts, etc.) received by the program to support its teaching, research, creative, or service activities. Identify any activities for which the program is making efforts or would like to obtain external funding. Indicate the relationship of these activities to the primary functions of the program. 3. If the program has a community advisory board, how does the board contribute to the quality of student learning?
1. As a result of the self-study, summarize the strengths and weaknesses of the program. 2. Identify and discuss current or ongoing challenges and discuss plans for improvement. Revisions approved by EPC and GSC,
© R.Madison
2003
Updated June 2003 |