History 485
Devine
Fall 2015
Final Exam Study
Questions
 
 
The final exam
will consist of two parts: SEVEN short essay questions and ONE long essay
question. In Part One, I will give you ten short essay questions; you will
choose seven to answer. In Part Two, I will give you three long essay questions;
you will answer one. The exam questions will be taken from the questions below.
There will be no questions on the exam that do not appear below. Since you have
the questions ahead of time, I expect
that you will be able to answer them with more than just a superficial
response. Be sure to include as much specific evidence as possible to explain
and support what you assert.
 
 - How did the United States first
     become involved in Indochina? Explain how the policies the Roosevelt and
     Truman administrations pursued led to U.S. involvement.
 
 - How did concerns about France
     affect the Truman administration’s decision whether to support Ho Chi
     Minh?
 
 - Why did U.S. support for South
     Vietnamese leader Ngo Dinh Diem prove
     problematic?
 
 - How did Vietnam’s history affect
     the way the Vietnamese – both North and South – perceived U.S.
     intervention in their country? Why did the Vietnamese see the nature of
     the conflict differently than did the Americans?
 
 - Why did Ho Chi Minh embrace
     Leninism? Why did he believe that it was useful in the Vietnamese context?
 
 - What role did the NLF (“Viet Cong”)
     play in the Vietnamese struggle for reunification and independence? Why is
     it misleading to characterize the NLF as simply a puppet of the North
     Vietnamese government?
 
 - Beginning on page 78, Hunt
     discusses “four key decisions” Johnson made on Vietnam.  What were they and why were they
     significant?
 
 - Beginning on page 99, Hunt reviews
     the four major criticisms of Johnson’s conduct of the war. What are they
     and to what extent are they justified?
 
 - Why was the 1968 Tet Offensive a
     significant benchmark in the Vietnam War?
 
 - How did the US perception of Soviet motives for invading Afghanistan
     differ from what in fact
     were the Soviet motives for doing so?
 
 - How did the Soviets in turn misperceive the US response to Moscow’s
     invasion of Afghanistan?  Why did
     the Soviets believe that the US response revealed Washington’s adherence
     to a “double standard” for superpower behavior?
 
 - Why was Afghanistan so politically
     unstable in the 1970s?  What roles
     did Amin, Daoud, Karmal,
     and Taraki in creating this instability?
 
 - What was the significance of UN
     Resolution 242?  Why did Arabs and
     Israelis interpret it differently?
 
 - Choose one of the three following Cold War case studies and
     explain how misperceptions and concern about credibility shaped U.S.
     foreign policy: 1) Bay of Pigs Invasion; 2) Vietnam; or 3) the Soviet
     invasion of Afghanistan.
 
 - What were the United States’ three
     broad objectives in the Middle East during the 1960s and why was it so
     difficult to achieve (or even to pursue) all three simultaneously? (See
     Hahn Chapter 4)
 
 - How did the 1967 Six Day War affect
     the Arabs?  How did it change the
     balance of power in the Middle East?
 
 - How did Israel’s victory in the Six
     Day War end up producing unintended consequences?  Why, arguably, had maintaining its own
     security become more difficult for Israel after the Six Day War?
 
 - Why did President Anwar Sadat of
     Egypt initiate the 1973 war against Israel?  Did he achieve his purpose?
 
 - What role did the US play in the
     1973 war?  Why did Nixon delay
     momentarily before coming to the aid of Israel? 
 
 - What were the achievements and
     shortcomings of 1979’s Camp David Accords?
 
 - What factors led to the Iranian
     Revolution of 1978?  Why was the
     Shah’s rule resented by so many different groups in Iran?
 
 - Why did the Ayatollah Khomeini
     believe it was in his interests to keep the American hostages?  Why, ultimately, did he release them?
 
 - Why did many nations welcome the
     Iran-Iraq war?  Why did it only
     provide short-term, but not long-term stability in the region? How did the
     outcome of the war set the stage for Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait?
 
 - Why was the Carter administration
     unprepared for the Iranian Revolution and indecisive in its response to
     it? Why did most observers consider Jimmy Carter’s handling of the Iranian
     hostage crisis to have been ineffectual? 
     
 
 - Why was Ronald Reagan so
     anti-communist?  Why was his
     anticommunism different from that of Richard Nixon?
 
 - How did Ronald Reagan’s view of the
     Cold War differ fundamentally from the more traditional balance of power
     view espoused by Nixon, Kissinger, and others in the “foreign policy
     establishment”?
 
 - Why did Reagan face such opposition
     from conservative pundits and the foreign policy establishment when he
     began to negotiate with Mikhail Gorbachev?
 
 - What was Reagan’s strategy for
     hastening the collapse of Communism? 
     What specific steps did he take to shove the Soviet Union into the
     “dustbin of history”?
 
 - How did Cold War anti-communism
     shape (and, arguably, distort) American policy in Central America?
 
 - In hindsight, the entire
     Iran-Contra affair seems like a fiasco that reveals incredibly poor
     judgment and a cavalier disregard for the law on the part of several
     Reagan administration officials and even the President himself.  How did the administration get involved
     in this series of ill-advised decisions?
 
 - Why was Reagan able to escape
     relatively unscathed from the Iran-Contra scandal (unlike Nixon, who did not
     survive the Watergate scandal)?
 
 - What was the substance of George
     Schultz’s “pitch” to Mikhail Gorbachev regarding the world’s economic and
     technological future?  Why was this
     an effective tactic to use with Gorbachev (as opposed to lecturing him on
     why the Soviet system wasn’t any good)?
 
 - According to Kaplan, how had the
     end of the Cold War changed America’s place in the world and made it more
     difficult to project its power?  Why
     does he believe the Bush administration’s “go it alone” policies failed to
     comprehend the realities of the post-Cold War world?
 
 - What was the “revolution in
     military affairs”? (Kaplan, 16) How did it employ new technology to change
     the U.S. military strategy?
 
 - What were the pros and cons of the
     new style of warfare associated with the “revolution in military affairs”?
     What did it do well?  What did it
     not do well?
 
 - How did the Clinton administration
     deal with North Korea?  Why does the
     author consider Clinton’s diplomacy relatively effective (as opposed to
     George W. Bush’s)?
 
 - What were some of the practical
     problems that made Anti-ballistic Missile (ABM) systems ineffective and
     cost inefficient? Why did politicians still continue to support this
     weapons program?
 
 - What were some of the key mistakes
     the United States made in the early days of the Iraq occupation that led
     to the subsequent violent insurgency?
 
 - President Bush equated the holding
     of free elections with “democracy.” 
     Why does Kaplan argue that the two were not synonymous?  How could free elections actually
     undermine the development of democracy?
 
 - What influence did Natan Sharansky have on
     George Bush’s thinking and policy making?
 
 - How did Realists and
     Neo-Conservatives differ in their views of how to conduct foreign policy?
     What was most important to Realists? What was most important to
     Neo-Conservatives?  
 
 - Why does Kaplan argue that
     policymakers in the Bush administration were “fantasists”?
 
 - What alterative approaches does
     Kaplan offer to what he believes are the failed policies of the Bush
     administration?  Why are history,
     technology, and culture key concepts to consider when developing
     alternatives?
 
 - Why are Randolph Bourne’s
     criticisms of the progressives who supported World War I also applicable
     to “left Wilsonians” or liberals who supported
     the Iraq War in 2003?