History 477
Devine
Spring 2013
Study
Questions: Beats, Satire, and “Sick” Comedy
Holton, “Sordid Hipsters of America”
1. During
the 1950s, why did modernity seem
linked to homogeneity? How had the
former seemed to produce the latter?
2. What
does Holton mean by the “folds of heterogeneity”? Why is this an apt metaphor to describe the
“cultural space” the Beats inhabited?
3. Why
did no political movement emerge after the war into which the dissatisfied
could channel their alienation, doing so perhaps in a united front? Why had the events of the 1930s and 1940s limited
the scope of political dissent?
4. Why
was dissent more cultural and individually-based during the 1950s?
5. What
is “it”? (p 14) What is “the closed
room”? (p 15) How do these
impressionistic terms shed light on what dissenters found alienating about
mainstream American culture?
6. Why
did the Beats come to identify with the “garbage pail” and the “social
dregs”? How, in a way, was this their
way of “walking away from it” or escaping the “closed room”?
7. What
role did Ginsberg’s Howl play in drawing
out a new subculture from the “folds of heterogeneity”? Why was hearing the poem a “moment of
recognition”? (p 19)
8. Why
was escaping the “closed room” seen primarily as a male problem? How did female rebels adjust to the male dominated
world of rebellion?
9. What
groups became models for men looking to find alternatives to mainstream
American society? Why was their
admiration of “outsiders” often naïve or even racist?
10. What
is an “anomic”? Why did the Beats seek
to establish a “sense of community” with them? What possibilities did their
presence in society suggest?
Kercher, “Comic Revenge”
1. How
was the liberal satire of the 1950s part of a larger American comic tradition
that prized “terrible honesty” and loathed hypocrisy and fakery?
2. What
distinguished satire from other types of humor?
Why was satire so controversial during the 1950s? To what extent was the controversy due to the
targets of the satire?
3. Why
did “sick” jokes become popular among young people in the 1950s? How have both contemporary and later critics
explained their popularity? To what
extent did the embrace of “sick” humor reveal a degree of smugness and
elitism? To what extent did it mask
progressive instincts or moral commitment?
4. How
did the lyrics of Tom’s Lehrer’s song parodies express both outrage and social
concern? Was Lehrer cynical,
misogynistic, or just disappointed with society? Did he fit into the tradition of “terrible
honesty”?
5. How
did Charles Addams’ cartoons satirize 1950s domesticity? Why did his fans enjoy his cartoons?
6. How
did the pages of Mad magazine display
founder Harvey Kurtzman’s “moral anger, his devotion to truth and authenticity,
and his urban Jewish Ameriucan wit”? (p 106)
7. What
did Kurtzman want to convey about the “Great American Way”? How did he use Mad to convey his message?
Why did his work draw an appreciative (mostly male) audience?
8. How
did Mad help to create a sense of
generational non-conformity among young people in the early 1960s? What explained its appeal to teens?
9. Why
did some critics claim that Mad was
no different than the culture it claimed to disdain?
10. What
influence did Mad have on the later generation
of rebels and radicals that emerged in the mid-1960s? What aspects of Mad did these young people find most inspiring?