History 371 Hon

Devine

Fall 2010

 

 

PRIMARY SOURCE ASSIGNMENT – WORLD WAR II IN THE POPULAR PRESS

 

Overview

 

Paging through old magazines, one can intuitively tell, simply by looking at the ads and the stories, that they were published during the war years – the patriotic themes, the association of every product imaginable with the “War Effort,” the prevalence of military-related imagery, the emphasis on sacrifice (but not too much sacrifice!), and the frequently (perhaps ritualistically) expressed hope that things will be “better than ever” once the war is won.

 

Your challenge in this assignment is to analyze print advertisements, photographs, and news or fiction stories from the war years (1941-1945) in order to evaluate the validity of Paul Fussell’s argument that portrayal of the war on the home front was anything but realistic or accurate.

 

In so doing, draw on Fussell’s Wartime and on our class discussion to look at these primary sources through a new set of historically informed eyes.

 

 

Choose an Option

 

Option #1:

 

In his book, Wartime, Paul Fussell contends that it was not just the danger, fear, boredom, uncertainty, loneliness, and deprivation that drove soldiers to despair.  According to Fussell, “It was rather the conviction that optimistic publicity and euphemism had rendered the [combat] experience so falsely that it would never be readily communicable.”  By drawing on two war-related articles, one each from two different popular magazines of the era, evaluate Fussell’s assessment of wartime coverage on the home front.  How accurately did American popular magazines depict the war?  Was the depiction as sanitized as Fussell argues or is he too critical of the popular press for obscuring the “real” war?  

 

Things you might look for include:  Given what Fussell has to say about the soldier’s wartime experience, does the magazine’s coverage seem unrealistic or sanitized?  Is it too upbeat?  Is it overly simplistic?  Does it neglect to mention certain issues and thus by its silence distort the reality of the war? Is it critical of U.S. policy or performance?  If you were a soldier in combat, how would you react to the coverage you see in these magazines?  Draw on specific evidence you find in the articles to bolster your thesis. It may be useful to choose one article from the beginning of the war years and the second from near the end of the war years. 

 

OR

 

Option #2:

 

During World War II, what messages did magazine advertisements try to sell their American readers?  Look closely at the ads in at least three issues of popular magazines from the war years; select at least four individual ads you wish to analyze and construct your thesis from what you observe.

 

Things you might consider:  What images, symbols, or sentiments seem to recur frequently?  Why is this the case?  How effectively have companies tied their “pitches” to the war effort?  What emotional response are they trying to solicit?  What values do they reflect?  What do the ads suggest the nation is fighting for?  How are Americans delineated from their enemies?  How is combat portrayed? Draw on specific examples and be descriptive of their contents to back up the points you are making.

 

 

 

Getting Started

 

The best way to choose ads or magazine stories is to go to the fourth floor of Oviatt Library where the bound magazines are shelved. There you will find full runs of numerous magazines from the wartime years – Time, Newsweek, Life, Saturday Evening Post, Atlantic, New Yorker, and Look.

 

As you browse through the magazines, remember the themes Fussell addresses and that we discussed in class regarding coverage of the war on the home front. How do the ads or stories that you’ve chosen to analyze comport with Fussell’s view that coverage of the war was “sanitized” or presented in overly euphemistic language?

 

Presenting your Findings

 

So we will know what you’re talking about, you should attach copies of your four ads or two articles to your paper.  Your paper should not simply describe or summarize the ads or articles, however.  We are less interested in your description of what’s in the ad or story (we can see or read that for ourselves).  We’re more interested in your analysis of these ads, images, and stories – to what extent do they either support or undermine what Fussell has to say in Wartime?  In other words, don’t tell us what we already see; give us a plausible “so what” – why is this particular source a useful piece of evidence for someone trying to learn more about how the media covered the war or how Madison Avenue exploited it to sell products? What specific aspects of a story or photograph are revealing about how the war was presented on the home front?

 

Citing

 

You should cite your magazine sources within the text of your paper. Include the magazine title and the date of the issue. For example: (Time, 6/6/1944).  Include a works cited page at the end, listing the issues of all the magazines that you used in your paper (magazine name and date of issue).  If you quote from Fussell or other course readings, cite, as usual in the text: (Fussell, 47).

 

 

The Bottom Line – What you should Turn In on November 6th

 

Your essay should be 900 words (approximately 3 pages double spaced).

As usual, number your pages, give your essay an appropriate title, and use 1-inch margins all around.  Be sure you email it to Shirley and me (cc’ing yourself) before 11:59 pm on Saturday, November 6th. You should also send us copies of the sources you used. If you can’t email us digital photos of your sources or scan photocopies of them and attach them to your paper, provide hard copies to us in class on Wednesday, November 3rd or turn them into the History department office by 5pm on November 5th. 

 

On the copy of each ad, be sure to write your name as well as the name and date of the magazine it came from.