History
342
Devine
Study Questions for Leffler and
Lippmann
Melvyn Leffler,
“The Emergence of an American Grand Strategy, 1945-1952”
1.
By
the end of the Second World War, the US was an economic powerhouse. Why, then,
did the nation’s leaders still feel insecure?
2.
Leffler notes that Truman sought to “forge an
international environment conducive to the American way of life.” What were
some of the key elements of such an environment?
3.
According
to Leffler, in 1946-47 the Truman administration did
not especially fear “premeditated Soviet aggression.” What did it fear?
4.
How
did Truman go about convincing his political opponents – primarily fiscally
conservative Republicans – that aid to Europe was necessary?
5.
After
1947, the Truman administration began to develop a specific strategy to achieve
its policy goals. What were the main priorities of this strategy?
6.
How
were economic recovery and political stability related? How did
achieving both in Europe also help to contain communism?
7.
Why
did Truman administration officials believe that Communist domination of Europe would undermine the American way of life?
8.
Even
after the coup in Czechoslovakia and the Soviet blockade of Berlin, why did the
Truman administration remain convinced that Stalin did not want war with the
US?
9.
Why
did US desire to spur economic recovery in Japan also focus Washington’s
attention on the nations of Southeast Asia?
How did this show that concerns about “core” areas had to take into
account conditions in “peripheral” areas?
10.
Why
did the US decide to oppose Ho Chi Minh in Vietnam even though Washington knew Ho had the support of the majority of his people? How was
this specific policy decision related to the “grand strategy”?
11.
After
1949, why did American policymakers come to believe that increasing US military
strength was the only way to pursue Washington’s grand strategy?
12.
What
were US policymakers chief security concerns in Asia?
13.
Why
did the Truman administration believe it had
to respond to the North Korean invasion of South Korea?
14.
How
did the Truman administration’s assessment of the USSR shape the war strategy
it pursued in Korea? How did its
strategy reflect a misreading of how China might respond?
15.
Leffler says US strategy was “more than
containment.” What does he mean by this?
Walter Lippmann, “Containment of the
Soviet Union is Poor Policy”
[Excerpts from Lippmann, The Cold War (1947)]
1.
According to Lippmann, what are the main
weaknesses of Kennan’s policy of “Containment”?
Why does he believe that implementing “Containment” is impractical?
2.
Why does Lippmann think Kennan’s
policy of Containment will be difficult to implement
effectively?
3.
What alternative to Containment does
Lippmann suggest?
4.
To what extent are you persuaded by
Lippmann’s critique of Containment?
5.
In a word, how would you describe
Lippmann’s approach to foreign affairs and the projection of American power?