School’s Out

Nearly half of all new teachers leave the job within five

years. What's killing their spirit? How can we get them to

stay?

 

 

 

by Claudia Graziano

 Download a PDF of this article Edutopia Magazine, Issue 3,

February 2005

 

It was late August four years ago when I sat down at a scratched wooden desk to begin my first teaching position. I

was nervous. I knew that the job, if done right, wouldn't be easy. There would be long hours and little pay. But I also

hoped that I could inspire kids the way my best teachers had inspired me.

 

What I didn't know then was that I wouldn't make it. Less than a year after facing my first classroom of 32 fidgeting

tenth graders, I walked away and never came back -- to that classroom or to teaching. I became a statistic.

 

I entered the teaching profession full of idealism. After years of working as a journalist, covering the frenetic

worlds of business and technology, I felt professionally unsatisfied. I spent my days writing about under-conceived

companies and overpaid CEOs. I spent hours hyping the latest gadgets.

 

My roommate, a high school math teacher, suggested I sit in on a few of her classes. They were raucous, open, and

energetic; I was fascinated. I had always loved language, and I saw teaching as a way to help kids appreciate it --

perhaps even love it -- as well.

 

By fall 2001, I made the career switch, completed much of my licensing credential, and was hired to teach tenth-grade

English at Sequoia High School, in Redwood City, California, about 20 miles south of San Francisco. By the new year, I

was gone.

 

Leaving So Soon?

 

 

Teachers speak out on why they stay. Or leave.  Every year, U.S. schools hire more than 200,000 new teachers

for that first day of class. By the time summer rolls around, at least 22,000 have quit. Even those who make it

beyond the trying first year aren't likely to stay long: about 30 percent of new teachers flee the profession after

just three years, and more than 45 percent leave after five (see charts, below).

 

What's more, 37 percent of the education workforce is over 50 and considering retirement, according to the National

Education Association. Suddenly, you've got a double whammy: tens of thousand of new teachers leaving the profession

because they can't take it anymore, and as many or more retiring.

 

When teachers drop out, everyone pays. Each teacher who leaves costs a district $11,000 to replace, not including

indirect costs related to schools' lost investment in professional development, curriculum, and school-specific

knowledge. At least 15 percent of K-12 teachers either switch schools or leave the profession every year, so the

cost to school districts nationwide is staggering -- an estimated $5.8 billion.

 

Students from the lowest-income families suffer the most. Inexperienced teachers (those with less than three years on

the job) frequently land in classrooms with the neediest and often the most challenging students. Beginning teachers

frequently start their careers at hard-to-staff schools where resources may be scarce -- in other words, urban

schools -- simply because there are more jobs available there.

 

It's a recipe for disaster for both teachers and students, says Barnett Berry, president of the Southeast Center for

Teaching Quality, in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Low-performing schools in high-poverty areas often cannot retain

a critical mass of veteran teachers, says Berry. "Not only are teachers who are new to these schools more likely to be

under-prepared, they're also more likely to be underqualified."

 

The U.S. Department of Education confirms that teacher turnover is highest in public schools where half or more of

the students receive free or reduced-price lunches. In California, for example, students in schools with large

minority populations are five times more likely to face an "underprepared" teacher (someone working on an emergency

credential or outside of the person's subject area) than are students in schools with low percentages of minority

students, according to a study conducted by SRI International and sponsored by the Center for the Future of

Teaching and Learning in conjunction with California State University and the University of California.

 

A Frazzling First Year

 

Click for Wanted: Better Training

 

Teachers quit for several reasons, but the one you'd expect to be at the top of the list -- salary -- typically isn't.

Even though they start their careers earning roughly $30,000 (and fork out, on average, about $500 of their own money for

instructional supplies), less than 20 percent of teachers who change schools or leave the profession cite salary as

their primary job complaint, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.

 

More frequently, the reason is dissatisfaction with administrative support (38 percent) or workplace conditions

(32 percent), according to the NCES's 2001 survey of 8,400 public- and private-school teachers. Poor administrative

support, lack of influence within the school system, classroom intrusion, and inadequate time are mentioned more

often by teachers leaving low-income schools where working conditions are more stressful; salary is mentioned more

often by teachers leaving affluent schools.

 

Many of these reasons are just euphemisms for one of the profession's hardest realities: Teaching can exact a

considerable emotional toll. I don't know of any other professionals who have to break up fistfights, as I did, as

a matter of course, or who find razor blades left on their chair, or who feel personally responsible because students

in tenth-grade English class are reading at the sixth-grade level or lower and are failing hopelessly.

 

New teachers, however naive and idealistic, often know before they enter the profession that the salaries are

paltry, the class sizes large, and the supplies scant. What they don't know is how little support from parents, school

administrators, and colleagues they can expect once the door is closed and the textbooks are opened.

 

"We don't put attorneys just out of law school alone on their first case, yet we put new teachers alone in the

classroom for their first year and expect them to shoulder the same responsibilities as veteran teachers," says

Kathleen Fulton, director for reinventing schools for the 21st century at the National Commission on Teaching and

America's Future. "Our induction model creates impossibly high expectations."

 

New teachers are expected to assume a full schedule of classes, create their own lesson plans, and develop teaching

techniques and classroom-management strategies in relative isolation. They are also expected to learn quickly the

administrative ins and outs of the job, from taking attendance and communicating with parents to navigating the

schools' computer network and finding the faculty bathrooms. The result: New teachers must weather a frazzling first year

that many veterans come to view as a rite of passage.

 

It's also a recipe for early burnout. Attrition rates for beginning teachers who have not had strong teacher-

preparation programs are much higher than for better-prepared colleagues.

 

"Not a day went by that I didn't go home and cry," remembers fourth-grade teacher Sue Manley of her first year. Manley,

who graduated from Northwestern University with a master's degree in education, thought she was well prepared for her

first assignment, teaching at a South Side Chicago elementary school. She had completed her student teaching

the previous year at a grammar school in the same neighborhood and had spent four months volunteering as a

classroom aide at another urban elementary school. Working with experienced teachers while she was still a graduate

student and a volunteer had made teaching look easy to Manley. "Academically, I was prepared. Socially,

professionally, and emotionally, I was not."

 

Like any new teacher, Manley needed to hone her classroom-management skills, but the pressures of managing a classroom

solo for the first time were compounded by the lack of basic resources and administrative support. "We weren't allowed to

use the copy machine [for handouts], so I had to stop at Kinko's every morning on my way to work," she

explains. "There was never any toilet paper in the bathrooms for the kids, so I had to bring that, too." The last straw

for Manley came in April, when she read a student's journal entry that described violent acts directed at her.

 

While Manley's situation may seem extreme, it's far from unusual. Other new teachers have reported similar feelings

of isolation and impossible expectations.

 

"The amount of time I put into teaching was huge, and I still felt overwhelmed," says Pam Zabel, a former high

school science teacher in Charleston, Rhode Island. Zabel, who holds a master's degree in education, says she was

assigned a mentor teacher who was theoretically there for support and professional coaching, "but it was a very

unstructured relationship -- I met with him maybe two or three times during the school year. For the most part, I was

on my own." Zabel left teaching after her first year and is now a full-time mom.

 

"Mentally draining" is how Jim Treman, a former ninth-grade science teacher, remembers his induction to teaching. "I had

no life for two years. I was constantly working. By the time Fridays rolled around, I was dead."

 

Treman worked as an architect for ten years prior to entering the single-subject credential program at San

Francisco State University. His decision to become a teacher grew out of an experience he'd had teaching English while

traveling in South America. He completed his student teaching as an intern, working as a full-time teacher while

earning his credential. "I was reluctant to take the position at first because I had no clue what I was doing,"

says Treman. "I was promised a ton of support, which in the end turned out to be completely untrue. I was totally on my

own."

 

Treman struggled to motivate his students; his assigned mentor, a physical education teacher, was unable to offer

Treman curriculum guidance. Other science teachers seemed unwilling to share their materials. The school district's

policy of laying off teachers in the spring and rehiring them in the fall didn't help. After his second year of

teaching, Treman returned to architecture.

 

It Started Out So Well

 

Zabel and Treman, like me, were on their own. I always chalked up my experience to a bad case of unrealistic

expectations. Maybe I was too spoiled by the fat and happy corporate world. Maybe I shouldn't have thought I would

enjoy teaching my first year.

 

But as a student teacher, I'd had a very positive experience. I had taught language arts to seventh graders at

a middle school in the upscale suburbs of San Francisco, and I was fortunate enough to have had an excellent mentor

teacher. I designed what I considered to be fun, innovative lessons. I invited journalist friends to talk to the class

about the persuasive power of writing. I organized grammar games and spelling contests. I brought in music from

the '30s to illustrate the concept of story setting. I researched yoga and breathing exercises to help students

take the edge off pretest jitters. (The entire class broke up laughing as we all tried to balance on one leg before the

SAT-9s.)

 

But when the semester was over, Taylor Middle School wasn't hiring. Through my university's placement program, I landed

a position at Sequoia. During the interview, the principal (who would be gone by that fall, along with the vice

principal) told me my limited experience teaching seventh grade was "perfect" for teaching tenth grade at Sequoia. I

was so naive that I didn't even ask why.

 

He promised plenty of support, recounted plans for a week-long new-teacher induction program before the school year

started, and described the school building's recent remodel. I was given the names and phone numbers of two other

English teachers willing to serve as my mentors that first year.

 

In practice, the induction program turned out to be something of a pep rally for new teachers, not a training

exercise. The mentor teachers who had promised to help did what they could but were either teaching different grade

levels or classes, and once the semester got under way had their own teaching concerns to address. In the end, I

stopped asking for help. I was sinking, yet no one in the administration noticed. The principal, a former English

teacher, observed my classes a few times and offered tips on my woefully underdeveloped classroom-management style, but

she seemed unconcerned by my obvious lack of experience.

 

She told me not to worry and that tenth grade is the year when students who aren't going to succeed drop out. "High

school is still a novelty for them in 9th grade," she said. "By 11th grade, those that are left are the ones

who've decided they want to graduate."

 

I didn't know what to make of that. Was I teaching students who were expected to drop out? As the semester progressed

and I watched students struggle through assignments that were clearly beyond their ability, I grew more anxious and

disheartened. I came home at the semester break and camped out on the sofa for three days, depressed and despondent.

When the semester resumed, I emailed the principal my resignation.

 

Support Systems

 

There are some effective ways to soften the coarseness of the first year. What made the difference for Manley, for

example, was a free two-year induction program sponsored by the University of Chicago's Center for Urban School

Improvement. The New Teachers Network offers first-and second-year teachers at Chicago public schools personalized

mentoring and online coaching that addresses a variety of issues, from classroom management to curriculum.

 

Several studies (and common sense) show that good mentoring programs can cut attrition rates by as much as half. Richard

Ingersoll, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania and a respected researcher in the field of education, analyzed

statistics from ten studies on mentoring and teacher induction to sort out what works and why.

 

His analysis, published in the American Educational Research Journal last summer, concludes that new teachers who receive

no induction are twice as likely to leave teaching after their first year as those who receive all six of the

supports his study identifies. These supports include having a mentor from the same field, collaborating regularly with

other teachers in the same subject, and being part of an external network of teachers.

 

Other successful induction methods include a program called INTIME (Integrating New Technologies into the Methods of

Education), which provides teacher candidates with videos of accomplished teachers in the classroom. The teachers in the

videos give lessons in a variety of contexts, including multiage classrooms, alternative high schools, special education students, and gifted and talented programs. Such preparation can drastically cut teacher attrition rates. For

people who are changing careers to enter teaching, schools like George Washington University offer assistive programs

for mid-career entrants, including former military and Peace Corps attendees. One example is the school's Transition to

Teaching Partnership, a collaboration with nearby Fairfax County Public Schools in Virginia.

 

 But while mentoring and induction programs for new teachers are a mainstay in most states, not all programs are created

equal. Of the 28 states that have state-level teacher-induction programs, only 10 actually provide funding for

such programs, as well as mandating them, according to Recruiting New Teachers (RNT), a nonprofit organization that

advocates national reform for teacher recruitment and development. That's a big problem. "Funding is critical,

because mentors need to be given the time to work closely with new teachers," says Mildred Hudson, CEO of RNT in

Belmont, Massachusetts.

 

The regimen of the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act may help bridge the existing funding gap for some states.

The first federal attempt to establish professional criteria for teachers, NCLB appropriates $2.85 billion over the next

two years to help school districts recruit, develop, and retain "highly qualified" teachers (i.e., those who meet

state certification requirements and demonstrate knowledge in their core subject area, according to NCLB). Indeed, last

fall the U.S. Department of Education unveiled a free professional-development Web site for teachers

(www.paec.org/teacher2teacher). Targeted mainly at K-8 instructors, the site offers streaming video of workshops

conducted by other teachers, as well as supplementary course materials.

 

In addition, consideration and time must be given to professional development. For instance, seminars and

lectures for beginning teachers were offered monthly at Sue Manley's school, but they were held on weekday evenings.

Manley usually felt too busy and worn out after teaching all day to attend them. It's a situation many new teachers --

myself included -- encounter. When new teachers aren't granted release time for professional development, many end

up going without. And eventually they just go.

 

Teachers who tough out the early years are often glad they did. Now in her seventh year of teaching, Manley has herself

become a coach and a counselor for new teachers. "My advice is," she says, "don't take things personally, be firm, and

be calm. And take care of yourself. It does get better."  Claudia Graziano is a writer based in San Francisco. Write

to claudia@claudiagraziano.com.

 

 

HOT LINK

 

Are you interested in learning more about the critical issue of preparing and retaining good teachers for our schools?

Visit www.edutopia.org/teachers for feature articles, video documentaries, and multimedia stories on how schools,

districts, universities, and states are tackling the issue.

 

SIDEBAR: Matchmaker

 

One organization working to redesign the way teachers are trained and recruited is the New Teacher Project (TNTP).

Formed in 1997, this nonprofit partners with school districts and universities nationwide to create alternative

routes to certification and to revamp slow, inefficient hiring practices. It also works to create innovative rural

recruitment programs for states with large rural areas that face challenges in attracting highquality teachers. A

fundamental goal of the TNTP is to find a better way to match up schools and new teachers. So far, the project has

attracted and prepared more than 13,000 new teachers and launched 39 programs in 18 states. -- C.G.

 

 

Credit: Mark Wagoner

SIDEBAR: Why Teach? We Asked and Were Overwhelmed

 

As we prepared this story on the alarming dropout rate among K-12 teachers, we decided to go to the source -- teachers

and others involved in education -- and ask them a simple question: Considering the long hours, low pay, and poor

support, why stay?

 

In early December, we sent out that email query. The response was overwhelming. In two days, we had 200

responses. In two weeks, we received more than 1,200. We heard from readers in Lake Havasu, Arizona, and London,

England; in Frisco, Texas, and San Francisco, California. Current and former teachers lamented their chronically low

pay -- that was expected -- but they also brought up their lack of autonomy, as classroom instruction is increasingly

dictated by bureaucratic mandates.

 

Many, like Deb Methvin, a resource teacher at Silver Springs Elementary School, in Silver Springs, Nevada, spoke of

feeling overwhelmed with the enormity of their tasks. "Sometimes there are semesters or a year that make

you ask yourself, 'Why did I go into this profession?'" wrote Methvin. "There are the days when you're overwhelmed

with paperwork, don't have enough time for planning lessons, need time to collaborate with your peers, have parents that

want meeting after meeting and still are never satisfied, and put in a load of overtime that the administration seems

to expect but never recognizes with praise or overtime pay."

 

Teachers balanced these frustrations with the job's many upsides, and often expressed the unmatched satisfaction of

seeing a student comprehend a difficult concept and the special joy of connecting with a child who has pulled away

from most adults. While some of the responses were predictable, others were refreshing and enlightening. Many

were deeply moving.

 

Respondents offered suggestions on how to keep good teachers motivated, commenting on the important role an educator had

played in their lives. Wrote Joette Daily, a special education teacher and liaison at Thomas C. Marsh Middle

School, in Dallas: "I can really make a difference in the lives of students. I absolutely hated school when I was

young. One teacher made a difference for me, and that experience completely changed my life. I remember

thinking, 'She accepts me for who I am and for what I can bring to the class.' I wanted to be that kind of teacher."

 

Time after time, respondents thanked us for asking their opinion -- something they are rarely asked to share. Most

also deeply believe that, despite the job's seemingly endless frustrations, teachers play an important role in a

democratic society.

 

Lorien Eck, a visual-arts teacher at John Muir Middle School in South Central Los Angeles, spoke for many when she

wrote, "The daily challenges are immense, yet the experience is soul empowering. . . . To see real-time results and

evidence of positive change in the lives of young people makes the efforts -- despite the pay, the hours, and other

drawbacks -- all worthwhile."

 

Visit www.edutopia.org/teachers to explore more of the responses we received.

 

 

Credit: Mark Wagoner

SIDEBAR: Strength in Numbers

 

Teachers represent one of the largest workforces in the United States. There are more educators than doctors,

nurses, and lawyers combined, and according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. schools employ 3.5 million

K-12 teachers. The education industry employs roughly 12.5 million people -- slightly fewer than health care, the

largest employment sector in the country. -- C.G.