Peer review of the Annotated References

• heading - Annotated References, centered, no bold, no underline
• are the summaries complete?
• do the articles seem to fit together?
• are the articles related to the topic?
• do the articles seem to be scholarly studies?
• check the format of the references, APA
• alphabetized
• hanging indent
• 1" margins all around
• double space throughout
• left justified (ragged right edge)
• one font throughout

Peer review of the Review of Literature

• centered vertically and horizontally
• name
• title
• class
• date

review of literature

• heading - Review of Literature, formatted correctly
• at least three level two subheadings, formatted correctly
• do the headings make sense and represent the information in that section?
• is each subsection a synthesis?
• is each section a cohesive unit?
• what might be missing?
• is a summary section needed?
• are all citations listed in the references?
• are all citations formatted properly?
• are the articles sufficiently related to the topic?
• do the articles seem to be scholarly studies?

references

• starts on a new page
• check the format of the references
• are all references cited in the review of literature?
• 1" margins all around
• double space throughout
• left justified (ragged right edge)
• one font throughout

Peer review of the Survey

• descriptive title
• brief introduction
• instructions

three demographic questions

• age
• sex
• third demographic, is it demographic? 
• does the third demographic item have at least three choices?

quantitative items

• interval/ratio level question
• ordinal level question
• third quantitative question

qualitative

• one qualitative question
• is it qualitative?
• does it encourage respondents to write complete sentences/paragraphs or does it seem to ask for short answers?

• no more than one piece of paper
• are all questions mutually exclusive?
• are all questions exhaustive?
• is it pleasing to the eye?
• is the font easy on the eyes?
• are all questions relevant?