SED
535 Two-Day Lesson
Plan Assignment Due: October 7 & 21, 2008
This assignment
has three parts: to plan, teach, and reflect on a two-day lesson. You will
submit the plan before the reflection, possibly even before you teach the
lesson. You will briefly present your lesson and reflection to the class for
discussion. Submissions must be typed or word-processed, except for
diagrams.
I.
Plan—Due October 7
Prepare a lesson
that spans two consecutive class meetings (or constitutes two consecutive days
of a longer lesson) for a course you teach.1
The purpose of the lesson should be for your students to develop a deep understanding of an algebraic or
geometric concept that is central to your course and to the CA content
standards. Therefore, the plan should engage
students in cognitively demanding tasks that promote studentsÕ construction of a relational understanding
of the concept(s). You are expected to incorporate strategies indicated by the research and by
readings and discussions in this course and in SED 646. These include (but are
not limited to) the use of significant problems, technology, and manipulatives;
strategic structures for participation and engagement; and informal, formative
assessment measures.
You may choose
the planÕs written format, but the plan must include the following:
In a separate
narrative section:
Ÿ a description of the demographics of the
class (including the numbers and needs of special-education and gifted students
and English learners)
Ÿ a statement of the concept(s) and content
standard(s) the lesson addresses and what you want students to be able to do or
understand at the end of the two days
Ÿ relevant background information about how the
lesson fits in the overall unit, what students have already mastered (including
their level of competency with any technology used), and any conceptual
problems or skill deficits that could impact their success in this lesson
Ÿ your rationale for this plan—why you
expect specific activities and features of your lesson to facilitate studentsÕ
construction of a deep understanding of the concept(s); support your rationale
by citing readings youÕve done for this course or elsewhere or by referencing
ideas from activities and discussions in this course or SED 646.
In the plan:
Ÿ
a clear description of the activities, actions, and
interactions of the teacher and students
Ÿ
a list of the necessary equipment and materials and a
description of the roomÕs configuration
Ÿ
a description of any student work products or performances
Ÿ
prepared questions to ask students during the lesson that anticipate
confusing aspects and that will help you assess understanding
Ÿ
ways to formally or informally assess studentsÕ understanding at
points during the lessons
Ÿ
homework assignments that reinforce the lessonÕs concepts or lead
into tomorrowÕs concepts
Ÿ
a copy of any handouts or visual aids.
II.
Teach Teach this lesson to the
target class.
III.
Reflect—Due October 21
After teaching
this lesson, write a 2-page (typed, double-spaced) reflection on its
effectiveness for engaging students in high-level thinking, facilitating a
relational understanding of the concept, and moving students towards your
stated goal. Discuss specific (pseudonymized) students and their responses to
particular parts of the lesson. Then describe how you would change the lesson
in order to help students achieve even deeper understanding if you were to
teach it again to these same students.
Presentation—Due
either October 21 or 28
You will present
your lesson to our class. Bring copies of the plan (not the reflection, and to save paper you may eliminate the
rationale from this version of the plan) for all classmates, or send it
electronically before your presentation date, so everybody will end up with a
collection of lessons that teach for understanding.
In your 5-minute
presentation to the entire class, please describe:
Ÿ the one
feature you designed into the plan that you expected to be the most
effective for engaging students in high-level thinking and promoting
understanding
Ÿ your reflection about how effective this one feature actually was for these
purposes and your evidence for that judgment
You will then
facilitate a 5-minute discussion in which you invite your classmates to provide
suggestions for revising this feature of your plan.

Scoring Criteria:
Completeness
of the plan, reflection, and presentation (all required parts present) 5 points
Potential
of the plan to engage students in high-level thinking
and promote relational understanding[1] 6
points
Quality
of the rationale for your plan, with support from external sources 6
points
Quality
of the reflection 6
points
Quality
of writing (clarity, mechanics, organization) 2
points
1) CA State Board of Education Mathematics Content Standards for
Algebra I.
At http://www.cde.ca.gov
Click on ÒStandards and Frameworks,Ó ÒContent Standards,Ó
ÒMathematicsÓ (or go directly to http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/mthmain.asp)
2) NCTM, Principles
and Standards for School Mathematics, algebra standards, pp. 37-40 and EITHER pp. 222-231 (Grades 6-8) OR pp. 296-306 (Grades 9-12) (at www.nctm.org)
3) Steele, M. M. & Steele, J. W. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning disabilities. Mathematics Teacher, 96(9),
622-624. (emailed)
1
Non-teachers must ÒborrowÓ a secondary-level class and teach
this lesson. Since you must design the lesson for a specific set of students,
youÕll need to find a class ASAP and get from the teacher detailed information
about the students and the curriculum surrounding your lesson.
[1] Note: You will not be assessed on the quality of your teaching or the actual effectiveness of the lesson. Yes, you can receive all 25 points with a lesson that bombs! What is required is that your plan and its rationale are sound and well supported, and that your reflection is insightful and Òfore-sightful.Ó Thus, there is no pressure to prepare a Òsure-fireÓ lesson, and no reason not to be honest in the reflection.