Topic: Identify
a situation on the campus or in your community which you would like to
see changed. Write a well organized essay in which you explain the situation,
the nature of the change you would like to see made, and the reasons why
this change is necessary or desirable.
Sample UDWPE Paper A: a "6" PAPER
I would like to see the parking and traffic
crunch on and around this campus eased. Unless a student arrives before
8 o'clock in the morning or in the afternoon, cruising the parking lots
or streets for a place to park is routine. Even buying a parking sticker
does not mean you will have the privilege of a space. Competition for spaces
during the rush hours of 9 A.M. to 11 A.M. is cutthroat. Would-be parkers
stake out sections of a parking row and sit in their cars hoping someone
in their section will leave. The other ploy is to try and catch someone
who is just walking back to their car in order to plead for that space.
lf these tricks fail, the only thing left is to park far away on the street
and walk.
There would seem to me to be several
ways to help the situation. The most obvious of these solutions is to increase
the amount of parking available. Another solution is to make car pooling
more attractive. Set aside space in a convenient lot for these cars with
three or more occupants. Perhaps another incentive would be to charge less
for a parking sticker for this lot. Also having free advertising in the
school paper for car pools might encourage more students to try and contact
potential ride sharers. In other words, make it convenient for car poolers.
In this same vein, buses or vans could be run to outlying areas which have
large numbers of Northridge students as residents. Charge a fee which would
be less than the student is now paying in parking fees and gas. lf the
buses or vans were advertised in the paper to increase student interest
and if they were run at convenient times, l am sure many students would
take advantage of the opportunity.
A somewhat different tack would be to
encourage bicycle riding and/or walking. Many students living close to
campus still drive when they could be bicycling. Making the roads safer
for bikers is of major concern and unsafe conditions are the reasons given
by many who do not ride. Providing bicycle lanes on all streets around
the campus would be extremely beneficial. This would decrease contact with
the faster moving traffic. Adding more bicycle stands on campus which are
secure would also encourage bike riding. Perhaps courses on bike riding
safety could be conducted on campus. Again, advertising of the new bike
lanes and bike facilities would encourage more people to ride. Also advertising
the health benefits of riding or walking should increase the number of
students who will take advantage of this inexpensive means of transportation.
There are several reasons why this change is both necessary and desirable.
As enrollment at Northridge increases, the problem is only going to get
worse. The problem is already bad and something needs to be done now to
alleviate it. Increasing available parking would do the most good and provide
safe, lighted parking for the majority. Parking on dimly lit side streets
has been very unsafe at night for quite some time. The other solutions
to the problem which I have outlined above are all energy conserving. Not
only will gas which was wasted cruising lots and streets for available
spaces be saved, but more gas will be saved by using car pools, buses,
vans, bikes or leg power. Friends will be made in the car, bus or van pools.
Health benefits can be derived from the bikes or from walking.
In conclusion, l feel that if you make
it cost effective and convenient for people to conserve, they will do so.
This conservation alone could probably alleviate the parking and traffic
problem or at least reduce it significantly. lt is up to the school and
community to make it convenient.
Comments
This is a clear and organized
treatment of the CSUN parking problem. It deals with all three parts of
the topic: the situation, the change needed, and reasons for the change.
It is well detailed, in fact more so than necessary in setting forth the
changes to alleviate the problem. The paper is carefully written and nearly
error-free, though the style is rather pedestrian and there are several
infelicities (e.g., a switch in person in the first paragraph, switches
to the imperative mood, and occasional wordiness).
Sample UDWPE Paper B: a "6" paper
A situation on campus which I would like
to see changed is not so much the increasing ethnically and racially-based
separation of student clubs and organizations, but the lack of communication
and exchange between them. There are valid arguments for the various racially
"isolated" clubs in that they provide a support network and common identity
for students who might otherwise feel culturally marooned on a campus as
large as ours. (Specifically, l feel that the "Iranian Students Club,"
"Armenian Americans" and "Hillel House," to name a few, all provide emotional
support to students away from home and their native culture.)
Perhaps one could even justify racial-based
separation within an area of common interest on the grounds that common
racial and cultural ties promote even better understanding within a common
sub-group. l refer specifically to the fact that there is a "Student Business
Association (almost exclusively white), a "Black Student Business Association"
(exclusively black), and a "Chicano Student Business Association (exclusively
Chicano). Now, all three of the aforementioned share the "common" distinction
of business students, yet they choose to sub-divide further. lt can be
argued that valuable contacts leading to post-graduate employment are made
through these clubs; it can be argued that Chicano or Black students have
problems not usually affecting whites (such as being victimized by racial
discrimination on a conscious or unconscious basis, or a poorly-educated
"inner city school" background; it can also be argued that these racially-divided
clubs arose in response to insensitivity and non-accommodation by the earlier-existing
predominantly white clubs
What I personally cannot justify is
the lack of communication and exchange of services between these types
of organizations. This lack of exchange results in wasted resources through
duplication of services, increased social (racial) separation, misunderstandings,
and what I refer to as "hardening of the attitudes." Why is it necessary
that there be three separate accounting tutoring labs -- each staffed separately
by each club? Why are all Charity Fundraisers done on an individual group
basis? Why are there no "joint" club parties? The potential for duplication
and misunderstandings is obvious -- less obvious is the "hardening of the
attitudes." If a person grows up in a racially or culturally isolated neighborhood,
it is possible he will attend K-12 still in racial isolation. College is
usually the "last chance" to reformulate attitudes and discard stereotypes
for these persons. And if a person is isolated in college, what chance
is there for growth of understanding and communication? This, to me, is
the crux of the problem -- not the (valid) existence of the separated clubs,
but that they are so self-contained as to allow almost complete insulation
from the attitude-stretching that comes of mixed social interaction.
Every culture (majority or minority)
is valid by definition, and deserving of preservation. Every group has
a right to bond together in common identity. But in our diverse society,
we must learn to work together, even while retaining our individuality,
and to learn how is a process that takes time and effort. l feel that the
excessive insulation (through "comfortable shelter") provided by the non-interaction
of these groups short-circuits this learning process, laying the foundation
for continued future racial and culture misunderstanding and separation.
Comments
Despite a relatively weak opening paragraph,
this is a well-reasoned and effectively written paper. Part of the effect
is due to the writer's facility for apt expression, as in the phrase "culturally
marooned" in the first paragraph. Unlike the previous paper, this one is
devoted mostly to a clarification of the situation and the need for change;
the changes themselves are stated briefly or implied through the use of
rhetorical questions.
Sample UDWPE paper C: a "5" paper
A Current Problem in the Delivery of Primary
Health Care - Emergency Medicine
Due to the advanced state of industry
a number of devices and machines have come into common use which, often
through intentional misuse, result in very serious injuries. Two examples
are the automobile and the gun. When a serious injury results from something
such as an automobile accident the victim usually has a very short period
in which to obtain emergency medical intervention before the shock resulting
from his or her injuries is irreversible. Usually this period of time is
not longer than one hour, and is often less. If measures to treat shock
and the cause of the shock, massive internal bleeding for instance, are
not instituted within this first hour after the injury the mortality rate
increases exponentially every fifteen to twenty minutes.
The state of emergency medical care
currently practiced in this community involves an excellent pre-hospital
phase under the jurisdiction of Los Angeles City paramedics. The paramedics
have jurisdiction of about thirty-five emergency rooms to which their patients
can be transferred after beginning medical treatment at the scene of the
accident. This is where the problem occurs. To provide the best possible
emergency care at the hospital, two factors play an important part. First,
the staff must work on at least two to three severely injured patients
daily to maintain their technical skill at top level.Second, surgeons and
operating rooms must be available within 15 minutes notice, twenty-four
hours a day, 365 days a year. In the San Fernando Valley, this level of
care is not met anywhere. In greater Los Angeles, this level of care is
met at less than six hospitals. The problem involves too many emergency
rooms for the population. The cost of maintaining an operating room on
fifteen minute standby day and night would put hospitals out of business,
since even the busiest hospitals only receive three to four severely injured
patients each week. The patient load would not support the very high cost
of this service.
The best remedy to this situation would
be to designate "Trauma Centers". Instead of having thirty five emergency
rooms taking care of the critically injured patients three or four selected
emergency rooms would be geographically designated to receive all of the
critical patients. This would provide enough of a case load to justify
the special equipment and staff that is required for such system. Most
importantly however, the morbidity and mortality rates from serious accidents
would be decreased because the equipment and staff would be available to
immediately treat a patient's shock as well as the underlying cause of
the shock. By providing a higher quality of care without duplicating the
services of an emergency room only a few blocks away, the rate of rising
health costs could probable be effectively checked in the area of emergency
medicine.
This entire argument can probably be
summarized by considering a hypothetical case study. A young woman falls
asleep at the wheel of her V.W. bug and crashes into a telephone pole.
Paramedics arrive finding her unconscious and in a sever state of shock,
although she is showing no evidence of external blood loss the paramedics
begin to treat the shock, but not the unknown underlying cause, and bring
her to the closest trauma center. The emergency room team, having seen
eight or ten cases similar to this in the last few weeks recognize the
few possible causes of the patients shock and prepare to take her to the
operating room while continuing to treat the shock. Within fifteen minutes
a surgeon has evaluated his patient, received the results of the lab test
and X-Rays, and is confident in his diagnosis of a ruptured spleen. The
laboratory has twelve units of cross matched blood ready within twenty
minutes of the patients arrival to the hospital. Within thirty minutes
of her arrival the patient has been taken to the operating room, had her
abdomen open and explored for injuries, and her damaged spleen removed.
The cause of her shock has been treated within forty five minutes, the
shock reverses, and the patient now has about a ninety five per cent chance
of recovery. The cost of this to her has been about two thirds of the old
system and her chances of recovery, if this accident had occurred between
10 p.m. and 8 AM are twice that of the old system. The overall asset of
this newer system to society is obvious.
Comments
This paper backs into the topic by first
detailing the reasons for change, then finally getting the problem before
the reader in the second and third paragraphs. (The opening two sentences
are not useful and should be omitted.) This failure to define the problem
early is a weakness, along with a sprinkling of spelling and punctuation
errors, but the vivid and specific details make it a forceful paper. The
change recommended by the writer is dramatized effectively (rather than
merely summarized) by the hypothetical example which constitutes the last
third of the paper.
Sample UDWPE paper D: a "4" paper
Quite often in life, one finds that the
amount of effort one puts into a particular activity is equivalent to the
benefit derived from it. On the CSUN campus one finds that most students
concentrate so intensely on their academic studies, that they end up eliminating
the benefits they could be gaining by becoming involved with their campus
activities. If the School spirit of CSUN's 28,000 students increased even
a small amount it would make Northridge a far more desirable and exciting
place to attend classes.
At the present moment most CSUN students
consider the Northridge campus as a place for academics only. There is
no sense of emotional attachment, no interest in being an active participate
in the universities growth. Due to the large size of the university, most
people readily accept their ID#, and complete their schooling as mechanically
as that number. Classmates often don't know each others names even though
they sit next to each other for a whole semester. And even if they pass
one another in the hall, rarely is a smile exchanged.
It would be a very exciting and refreshing
change if all students put forth that little bit of extra effort to make
other students feel a welcome part of the campus, to take pride in CSUN.
Since the size of the campus cannot be decreased to give that personalized
feeling of belonging, it is up to the students attitudes to make the change.
If all students gave out more smiles to strangers, or make an effort to
allow a classmate who has been absent to copy class notes they would make
a few more friends. Frequently people would attend more school sponsored
events if clas s mates encouraged them, and wanted to see them there.
This change is desirable because it
makes CSUN a more desirable to go to school, and enriches the lives of
all participants. Everyone enjoys a friendly face and a word of encouragement
and support. (especially after a difficult exam). By exposure and interaction
with more people, the individual is able to grow in knowledge in more than
academic directions. They are able to grow socially & develop other
interests than their major. The individual whose an excited participant
in school activities also has opportunities to develop life-long friends,
for often there is not as great an exposure to people once a career is
started.
Although CSUN is a large campus, there
is no excuse for students to ananamously loose themselves among one another.
By putting forth the effort to show interest in others and the growth of
the college, many additional benefits can be derived.
COMMENTS
This paper is a clear example of an "adequate"
rather than good essay. On the plus side, after the first sentence (which
should be omitted) the writer develops her thesis and covers all three
parts of the topic in a clear and organized fashion. However, the paper
is thin in content, has several errors of spelling and mechanics, and is
marred with slight illogicalities ("it is up to the students attitudes
to change"), weak passives ("a career is started." "benefits can be derived"),
and awkward phrasing. Though a passing paper, it is near the lower end
of the "4" range.
|