MATH 131--Class Notes--Spring 08

Part I: Apportionment

Wednesday, 01/23/08, and Friday, 01/25/08: We started discussing the procedure used to elect the

President of U.S. That process is laid out in Article II, Section I, of the U.S. Constitution (Underlined text

means that it was amended. By clicking on any part of the underlined text you will get the respective

amendment.), which states:

Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors,

equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the

Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the

United States, shall be appointed an elector.”

We need to now figure out how many members of Congress each state has. The number of Senators

is 2 per state, which leaves us with the problem of figuring out how many Representatives each state

has. Again, the U.S. Constitution tells us how to go about it. Article I, Section 2, states:

“Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several states which may be included

within this union, according to their respective numbers, …. The actual Enumeration shall be made within

three years after the first meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent term

of ten years, in such manner as they shall by law direct. The number of Representatives shall not exceed

one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one Representative;”

(I left out here the mention of the infamous 3/5-rule which we discussed in class.)

Mathematically, there are two stipulations that we need to respect: 1) Apportionment has to be based on

the population numbers and 2) No more than 1 Representative for every 30,000.

After the 1790 census, the 15 states had the following apportionment populations:

 

CT

236,841

DE

55,540

GA

70,835

KY

68,705

MA

475,327

MD

278,514

NC

353,523

NH

141,822

NJ

179,570

NY

331,589

PA

432,879

RI

68,446

SC

206,236

VA

630,560

VT

85,533

 

Note: Remember that these numbers do NOT necessarily represent the number of people in each state. 
Due to the 3/5-rule slave states had actually a larger population than the number in the table indicates. 
 
The first suggestion as to how to approach this problem came from one of you was to divide each state’s 
apportionment population by 30,000. E.g., NH’s apportionment population in 1790 is 141,822. Dividing 
by 30,000 gives 141,822/30,000 = 4.7274. To make sure NH does NOT get “more than one for every 
30,000” we round DOWN the quotient 4.7274 to 4. With 4 representatives the average for NH is 
141,822/4 = 35,455.5, which is allowable under the Constitution. If we carry out this calculation for 
each of the 15 states we get:
 

 

 

÷30,000

rounded down

CT

236,841

7.8947

7

DE

55,540

1.851333

1

GA

70,835

2.361167

2

KY

68,705

2.290167

2

MA

475,327

15.84423

15

MD

278,514

9.2838

9

NC

353,523

11.7841

11

NH

141,822

4.7274

4

NJ

179,570

5.985667

5

NY

331,589

11.05297

11

PA

432,879

14.4293

14

RI

68,446

2.281533

2

SC

206,236

6.874533

6

VA

630,560

21.01867

21

VT

85,533

2.8511

2

 

 

 

112

    
 
Thus this process apportions a House with 112 seats. 
Fortunately (if you’re inclined to think of mathematics as being fun) or unfortunately (if ….) the story 
doesn’t end here because this method causes big problems. (we’ll get to the problems in a bit.) 
 
Let’s start over and ask ourselves the following question: How should we apportion a House with 112
seats given the apportionment populations of the 1790 census? A suggestion from on of you was to 
divide the total population of all states, which is 3,615,920, by 112. This quotient is 
3,615,920/112 = 32,285 and it tells us that ideally each representative represents 32285. Now given 
NH’s apportionment population of 141,822 we divide that number by 32,285 and get 4.3928. Thus 
NH has 4.3928 ideal districts. If we carry out this process for all the states we get:
 

CT

236,841

7.33595

DE

55,540

1.7203

GA

70,835

2.19405

KY

68,705

2.12808

MA

475,327

14.7228

MD

278,514

8.62673

NC

353,523

10.9501

NH

141,822

4.39281

NJ

179,570

5.56203

NY

331,589

10.2707

PA

432,879

13.4081

RI

68,446

2.12006

SC

206,236

6.38798

VA

630,560

19.5311

VT

85,533

2.64931

Total

3,615,920

112

 
Of course we can only apportion integer number of representatives. One we to deal with this problem 
is to apportion each state at first its integer part of ideal number of districts. 
 

CT

236,841

7.33595

7

DE

55,540

1.7203

1

GA

70,835

2.19405

2

KY

68,705

2.12808

2

MA

475,327

14.7228