Chapter 2 - The Conceptual Framework
Definitions |
Examples
|
The Conceptual Framework - Topics: |
The Conceptual Framework
The conceptual framework consists of six
Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts (SFAC) comprising a set of objectives (SFAC 1 [Business Enterprises] and 4 [Non-business
Organizations]), characteristics of information (SFAC 2) principles (SFAC 5) constraints (SFAC 2), and elements (SFAC3,
6) that are meant to help the rule makers (Financial Accounting Standards Board [FASB] develop good
financial accounting standards. Understanding the conceptual framework should also
help information providers (management and accountants) to provide "good"
information in cases where no official rules have been developed. Businesses and accountants (and a lot of other people) spend lots of time and money on preparing annual reports, press conferences, press releases, briefings for financial analysts, etc. All of this is supposed to provide information. Objectives of Financial Information (SFAC 1 and 4):![]() |
Information
Types of Information. To understand what information investors want, it is necessary to understand what their ultimate investment objective is. What do you think? If you give it a little thought, you will quickly realize that "they are in it for the money". In other words, they want to get cash. Maybe not right now, but certainly sometime. Knowing this leads to the next question. Under what circumstances will investors get money from stocks or bonds? There are only two possibilities: 1. they may receive dividends (from stocks) or interest (from bonds) and 2. They may sell the stocks or bonds (hopefully for more than what they paid for it) or the bonds are retired (paid off). Ok, that was not so bad. Under what condition will this happy event (getting dividends or interest, selling stocks or bonds for more than the price originally paid) occur? Why, only if the corporation makes money. In accounting we talk a lot about income, about revenues and expenses, but in the end, it must result in money - cash flow. Therefore, it is believed that investors most of all want information that will enable them to predict a company's future cash flow. |
Important Characteristics of Information
To make information "decision
useful" it must possess certain characteristics. Some of these are general
(they apply to information in any context) others are specific to accounting. General Characteristics (SFAC 2: The most important are : Decision Usefulness and Understandability. The world is filled with information and we are constantly making decisions based on the information we have. Assuming rational behavior (a heroic assumption), we use information that can help improve our decision. In other words, we factor decision useful information into the decision and ignore other, irrelevant information. Of course, we can only do this if (a) the decision useful information is available to us and (b) we can understand it. For information to be decision useful it must be relevant , reliable and comparable. Relevance and reliability are of crucial importance, but, unfortunately, they are not always compatible. This results in a lot of problems for accounting information providers and rule makers. We will come back to these terms again and again during the semester. You may get sick and tired of them, but they won't go away. We constantly need to evaluate whether accounting information meets the relevance/reliability criteria. More often than not we must make a trade-off in favor of one or the other. Sometimes the trade-off decision has been made. For example, the historical cost of a piece of land is reliable information (it can easily be verified). But is it relevant to a banker who is trying to assess its value as security for a loan? Maybe, maybe not: If the land was bought fifty years ago, it is probably irrelevant and a current evaluation must be made. The banker relies instead on a current appraisal of the property. That is highly relevant but, it is not completely reliable (the appraiser is only making an educated guess, after all). Quite often decision making requires comparison of information items. In that case it is essential that information be comparable (think of apples and oranges!)It is difficult, if not impossible to always (or even most of the time) have equally high degrees of relevance, reliability and comparability in accounting information. What to do? This is where the Full Disclosure principle comes into play. If you know how an information item was developed and what its limitations are, you can still use it, even if it is not "perfect in every way". |
Constraints on Accounting Information (SFAC 2):
Is more information always better? No. Information is costly and the benefit derived from it should exceed the cost of producing and using it. Sometimes an information item is simply not important enough to make a difference to a decision - it is immaterial. And finally, in the U.S., it is considered important that accounting information be conservative (it is better to understate than to overstate). There is also a rather strong requirement to stick with historical cost, even though it understates values over time and becomes irrelevant. |
Important Accounting Principles (SFAC 2 and 5)
Recognition - Realization -
Measurement
|
Accrual Accounting versus Cash Accounting
We use accrual accounting (which is much more complicated than cash accounting) because it assures full employment for accounting . No. We use it because of the need to provide periodic reports on how a corporation is doing to investors, creditors and other interested parties. It was decided that these people want information that will help them 1. assess the amount, timing and riskiness of future cash flows and 2. evaluate the financial position of the firm. Ok, how are we going to do that, if the company is expected to continue indefinitely (going concern assumption). Because of this, for example, a company will buy a plant for $60 million that is expected to last for thirty years. The money is spent in the first year. Under cash accounting this results in $ 60 million in expense in year one and zero expense in years 2 through 30. This causes a problem, if you are trying to predict how the company will do in the future. If you look at year one, things look terrible - little income and an enormous ($60 million) amount of expense. So you don't buy stock in the company. But what if you looked at the company in any of the following years? You would be very impressed - no expense from the plant, only revenue. You would be likely to pay too much for it. Under accrual accounting, using proper revenue and expense recognition rules, each year in which the plant operates (helps earn revenue) will be charged with a portion of the cost of the plant. as a result, each year will show the same amount of expense relating to the plant. This makes for much better (relevant) information. |
Financial Statements and their Elements (SFAC 3, superceded by SFAC 6)
Under the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934 ('34 law) corporations are required to provide current and prospective
investors with financial statements at regular intervals (annual and quarterly reports).
Corporations are also required to file reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) annually on Form 10K and quarterly on Form 10Q. These
reports consist of the following: |
What do investors wish to do (with information about the firm)? | Information | How does it help? |
predict future cash flows
|
Income Statement | provides information about the company's earnings ![]() |
evaluate the company's financial position and its stewardship | Balance Sheet | provides information about assets, liabilities and
stockholders' equity ![]() |
evaluate the company's cash flow | Cash Flow Statement | shows where the company got money and how it was spent
![]() |
Income Statement Elements |
||
Item | Definition | Example |
Revenue | income earned from normal operations of the firm | Computer store sells a computer |
Expense | costs incurred in order to earn revenues | Computer store recognizes cost of the computer sold above |
Gains | positive income resulting from infrequent or unusual activities | Computer company sells a delivery truck for more than its book value |
Losses | negative income resulting from infrequent or unusual activities | Computer company sells a delivery truck for less than its book value |
Balance Sheet Elements |
||
Item | Definition | Example |
Assets | Cash or things or right to cash, etc. owned and/or controlled by the firm |
|
Liabilities | claims against the firm by creditors |
|
Stockholders'
Equity
|
Claims by owners (a) contributed capital |
|
Sum of all income less all dividends paid | retained earnings |
Activity | Definition | Example |
Operating | cash received less cash paid in normal operations |
|
Investing | cash received from sale of assets less cash paid for assets ( non-operating activities) |
|
Financing | cash received from creditors or owners less cash paid to creditors or owners |
|
Revenue is recognized when the earnings process is essentially complete |
|
Necessary conditions: | Example (at or before cash received) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
all conditions have been met ![]() |
|
Example (after cash received) | |
|
|
Costs have not yet been incurred | No services have been performed yet |
cash has been received | the customer has paid |
all conditions have not been met ![]() |
Expenses are recognized when incurred |
|
1. Matched with Revenue: (cause and effect) | Example (a refrigerator was sold, revenue was recognized) |
a. the refrigerator had been purchased and paid for in an earlier period or it will be paid later | cost of goods sold expense recognized when refrigerator is sold |
b. a warranty was issued, cash may or may not have to be paid in the future (repair may or may not be needed) | warranty expense is estimated and recognized when refrigerator is sold |
c. salesperson receives commission on the sale (cash paid) | salary expense when refrigerator is sold |
2. Allocated over time: (cause and effect difficult or impossible to determine) | Example: Depreciation |
cash was paid when equipment purchased | each year a portion of the cost is recognized as depreciation expense |
3. Immediate Recognition (no future benefits expected) | Example: 1. Administrative expenses, 2. Loss |
a. cash will be paid next period | employees have worked, salary expense recognized |
b. cash had been paid | nobody will buy pet rocks. they are written off as a loss |
|
|||
Elements |
Relevance (the information relates to the decision) |
Example |
possible conflict with reliability |
Predictive ability | information helps predict whether the objective will be reached | KNX traffic and weather report: temperatures in the high 80's, minor accident on PCH | Is it true? Maybe the "minor" accident turns out to be an overturned tanker |
Timeliness | the information is received in time to help make the decision | You want to go to the beach at 11 am. The hear the traffic and weather report at 10:45 am | a forecast is an educated "guess". Only after the fact will you know today's temperature for sure. |
Feedback value | the information helps evaluate a past decision, improves the current decision | "Minor" accident on PCH caused two hour delay in getting to "your" beach | |
Elements |
Reliability ( the information is true) | Examples |
possible conflict with relevance |
Verifiability | the measurement can be duplicated independently . | Other weather stations arrive at the same temperature estimate | You don't have the time to get three weather reports |
Representational faithfulness | The information gives a "true" picture of the item of interest | The current temperature is determined with an accurate thermometer, not the Richter scale | "100% correct" information is hard to find in time. You have to make a decision. Slightly inaccurate is better than flying completely blind |
Neutrality | The information provider has no hidden agenda | KNX doesn't care if you go to the beach because of their weather report | The accident was "minor" according to Neptune's Net. They want customers. Can you trust the report? Should you ignore it? |
Comparability | |||
consistency (across information providers) | can two (or more) items legitimately be compared? | KVEN predicts 30 degree weather for Ventura. KNX predicts 85 degrees for Long Beach. You drive south. Later you find out that KVEN reported in Celsius, KNX in Fahrenheit. Was it really colder in Ventura? The two reports were not comparable. | |
consistency (over time) | can two (or more) items legitimately be compared? | KNX reports yesterday's high temperature as 85 degrees and today's as 30 degrees. Wow! The temperature sure dropped overnight! Or did KNX decide to join the rest of the world and switched to Celsius without telling you? | |
Full Disclosure | |||
provide sufficient detail about how information item was developed to make it useful | E.g., If KNX switched from Fahrenheit to Celsius and announced that 85 degree Fahrenheit is about 30 degree Celsius, then the information is comparable and useful. |
For example, you
are trying to decide whether to go to the beach to work on your tan. ![]() ![]() Knowing which kind of information is likely
to be useful is good. Getting it is even better, but you must be able to understand
it! As you can see, we are simply talking common sense here. You already knew all of this didn't you? |
Information about
whom: ![]() |
Information for
whom: ![]() As regards other "reasonably sophisticated" information users such as creditors and managers: they are assumed to be able to use the same information as investors. |
Information for what
purpose: ![]() |