Critical Reasoning
Philosophy 200 with
Prof. Gregory Owcarz in SH 321 on MWF at
“We must
follow the argument wherever it leads.” - Socrates (Fifth Century BC)
“Three
minutes’ thought would suffice to find this out; but thought is irksome and
three minutes is a long time.”
“Many
people would sooner die than think. In
fact they do.”
- A.E. Housman and Bertrand Russell (Twentieth Century AD)
Required
The Elements of Reasoning The Examined Life
by
D. Conway, R. Munson, A. Black by Robert Nozick
What Does It All Mean? A
Rulebook for Arguments
by
Thomas Nagel by Anthony Weston
How to Do the Right Thing The Elements of
Style
by
Colin McGinn by William Strunk
and E.B. White
Additional Assistance
Office Hours: MWF
Office Contact: Tel.
818-677-4796, Email GregoryO@csun.edu, Office in ST 516
Course Description
This course
satisfies the critical reasoning section (A.2) of the General Education
Program, which recognizes critical reasoning as a fundamental competence.
Courses in this section of General Education take reasoning itself as their
focus. Their goals are to provide students with criteria and methods for
distinguishing good reasoning from bad and to help students develop basic
reasoning skills that they can apply both within a broad range of academic
disciplines and outside the academic environment. Students are expected to
acquire skill in recognizing the logical structure of statements and arguments,
the ability to distinguish rational from non-rational means of persuasion,
skill in applying the principles of sound reasoning in the construction and
evaluation of arguments, and an appreciation of the value of critical reasoning
skills in the pursuit of knowledge. The arguments considered will be those
commonly encountered in everyday life, when one stops to reflect somewhat
philosophically on that life – arguments involving love and death and God and
law and wisdom and so on. The aim is good thinking and putting it to use in
thinking over what really matters, the better to reflect on oneself and on
one’s world at large. Socrates may exaggerate in suggesting that the unexamined
life is not worth living, but sound reasoning informs and invigorates people’s
lives. Surely the unexamined life is not lived as fully.
Policies and Requirements
Class Format Classroom activities and discussion constitute 30% of the final course grade,
to be determined according to participation, homework, and attendance. Some
lectures will be given where necessary to introduce new material or difficult
concepts, but practice and discussion are fundamental to examining and
evaluating modes of thought, and grading will reflect the integral role of that
participation.
Two In-Class Exams Each exam constitutes 35% of the final course grade, and the final exam
presupposes familiarity with material from the midterm. Make-up exams will not
be offered.
Homework Assignments Short exercises will be assigned for each class meeting, which will be
discussed and collected as attendance records. These endeavors facilitate
classroom discussion and help ensure that a steady course of study is
maintained to keep up with the subject matter. Late work will not be
accepted.
Deadlines The deadline this semester to
withdraw without having to seek special permission is Friday, February 18th,
and to withdraw with only the instructor’s signature is Friday, February 25th.
After that date, according to CSUN’s regulations,
withdrawal will require additional approvals and can only be obtained for
“serious and compelling reasons” and provided that there is “no viable
alternative”.
Tentative Schedule of Topics
-Week One: Introducing Argument
Argument Defined, Language and Argument, Inference
Indicators, Implicit Premises
-Week Two: How We Know and the Anatomy of Argument
Strategies of Analysis, Explanations, Conditionals,
Disjunctives, Complex Arguments
-Week Three: Eating Animals and Evaluating Arguments
Deduction, Validity, Truth, Soundness
-Week Four: Other Minds and Evaluating Arguments
Induction, Statistical Syllogisms, Complex Argument
Structure
-Week Five: Meaning and Definition
Types, Methods, Standards of Definition
- Week Six: Abortion and Ambiguity
Vagueness, Referential Ambiguity, Grammatical Ambiguity
- Week Seven:
Death and Reasonable Belief
Accepted
Belief, Logical Possibility, Necessary Truth, Laws of Thought
- Week Eight:
Mind-Body and Argument by Analogy
Analogical
Arguments and Models
Midterm Exam
-Week Nine: Violence & Validity
Sentential Forms, Connectives, Negation, Symbolizing
- Week Ten: Justice and Invalid Argument Forms
Conditionals, Equivalence, Rules of Inference and
Equivalence
-Week Eleven: Categorical Reasoning
Categorical Statements, Categorical Syllogisms, Venn
Diagrams
-Week Twelve: Sex and Fallacious Reasoning
Fallacies of Relevance and Inadequate Evidence
-Week Thirteen: Drugs and Fallacious Reasoning
Illegitimate Assumptions, Response and Criticism, Defense
-Week Fourteen: Censorship and Causal Analysis
Necessary and Sufficient Conditions, Causal Explanations,
Testing Causal Claims
-Week Fifteen: Virtue and the Meaning of Life
Structure, Style, Persuasion, Simplicity