Policy Analysis Format 
Public Policy Analysis
Dr. Matthew Cahn
Department of Political Science &
Masters of Public Administration
California State University, Northridge

Policy Analysis Paper Format (20-25 pages)

I.          EXECUTIVE SUMMARY   (2-3 pages):

This should be on separate pages between the title page and the beginning of the Policy Analysis itself.  Summarize the content of the entire brief in one page.  The summary should:

1)      state the problem or issue (RQ);
2)      give BRIEF background;
3)      identify major alternatives;
4)      state preferred alternative with justification;

II.         INTRODUCTION and PROBLEM STATEMENT  (3-4 pages)

This is the introduction to the Policy Analysis and the Policy Issue.  Identify with clarity and specificity the problem being addressed (the RQ), with a summary of the policy issues at stake and the primary options.  (Why is problem important?)

III.       ASSEMBLE EVIDENCE (4-6 pages)

Provide specific background for the question at hand.  Clients will be concerned with the substance of the debate, but they must also know something about the politics. In particular, they need to know what the goals and objectives are that the policy options are supposed to achieve; they need to know the dimensions and parameters of the problem; and they need to know the state of the problem.

IV.      CONSTRUCT ALTERNATIVE POLICY RESPONSES (6-8 pages)

Discuss the alternative policy responses under consideration (at least 3). Examine the "best practices" of other agencies, as well as policy proposals that are emerging.  The discussion of each option should be balanced, and should reflect the evidence/ data indicating degree of potential utility.  Under what conditions are options likely to be most useful?

V.       LIST SPECIFIC CRITERIA USED IN MAKING EVALUATION (2-4 pages)

State the criteria that you will use to score the alternatives explicitly.  Specific criteria depend on context of problem, but typically include such issues as mitigating measurable indicators associated with problem, cost-efficiency, and equity?

VI.     APPLY CRITERIA (4-8 pages)

Apply the Criteria to each of the policy alternatives using the most appropriate methodology.  This should be done in a transparent manner, with all data and results listed explicitly.  If possible, score the alternatives.  Summarize comparative assessment using a matrix or similar summary display.

VII.    RECOMMENDATION (2-4 pages)

Close the Policy Analysis with a recommendation that summarizes the preferred policy option.  Justify why this option is preferred over the others.  If the policy options are weighted and scored, identify the criteria used to score the options, and their order of priority.